EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Begum Genc
dblp:166/1277 · also Begüm Genç
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
8as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-0116-6005ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 59% Mathematical optimization · 31% Automated reasoning and model checking · 10% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching › matching algorithms
stable marriage |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | Finding Robust Solutions to Stable Marriage · IJCAI 2017 Robust Stable Marriage · AAAI 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
explanation generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Explanation in Constraint Satisfaction: A Survey · IJCAI 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › diagnosis
model-based diagnosis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Explanation in Constraint Satisfaction: A Survey · IJCAI 2021 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching
matching algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Robust Stable Marriage · AAAI 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty
robust optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Robust Stable Marriage · AAAI 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › network visualization
biological network visualization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | An algorithm for automated layout of process description maps drawn in SBGN · Bioinform. 2016 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Explanation in Constraint Satisfaction: A Survey · IJCAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
constraint programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Finding Robust Solutions to Stable Marriage · IJCAI 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
local search |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Finding Robust Solutions to Stable Marriage · IJCAI 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems bioinformatics
pathway representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | An algorithm for automated layout of process description maps drawn in SBGN · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability · 0.3robustness · 0.3local search · 0.3genetic algorithm · 0.3constraint programming · 0.3(a,b)-supermatch · 0.3force-directed layout · 0.2compound spring embedder · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A Collection of Constraint Programming Models for the Three-Dimensional Stable Matching Problem with Cyclic PreferencesabstractWe introduce five constraint models for the 3-dimensional stable matching problem with cyclic preferences and study their relative performances under diverse configurations. While several constraint models have been proposed for variants of the two-dimensional stable matching problem, we are the first to present constraint models for a higher number of dimensions. We show for all five models how to capture two different stability notions, namely weak and strong stability. Additionally, we translate some well-known fairness notions (i.e. sex-equal, minimum regret, egalitarian) into 3-dimensional matchings, and present how to capture them in each model. Our tests cover dozens of problem sizes and four different instance generation methods. We explore two levels of commitment in our models: one where we have an individual variable for each agent (individual commitment), and another one where the determination of a variable involves pairing the three agents at once (group commitment). Our experiments show that the suitability of the commitment depends on the type of stability we are dealing with. Our experiments not only led us to discover dependencies between the type of stability and the instance generation method, but also brought light to the role that learning and restarts can play in solving this kind of problems. Ágnes Cseh, Guillaume Escamocher, Begum Genc, Luis Quesada 0001 |
CP | 3 |
| 2021 | Explanation in Constraint Satisfaction: A SurveyabstractMuch of the focus on explanation in the field of artificial intelligence has focused on machine learning methods and, in particular, concepts produced by advanced methods such as neural networks and deep learning. However, there has been a long history of explanation generation in the general field of constraint satisfaction, one of the AI's most ubiquitous subfields. In this paper we survey the major seminal papers on the explanation and constraints, as well as some more recent works. The survey sets out to unify many disparate lines of work in areas such as model-based diagnosis, constraint programming, Boolean satisfiability, truth maintenance systems, quantified logics, and related areas. Sharmi Dev Gupta, Begum Genc, Barry O'Sullivan |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2020 | A Two-Phase Constraint Programming Model for Examination Timetabling at University College Cork
Begum Genc, Barry O'Sullivan |
CP | 1 |
| 2019 | An Approach to Robustness in the Stable Roommates Problem and Its Comparison with the Stable Marriage Problem
Begum Genc, Mohamed Siala 0002, Gilles Simonin, Barry O'Sullivan |
CPAIOR | 1 |
| 2019 | Complexity Study for the Robust Stable Marriage Problem
Begum Genc, Mohamed Siala 0002, Gilles Simonin, Barry O'Sullivan |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 2017 | Robust Stable MarriageabstractStable Marriage (SM) is a well-known matching problem, where the aim is to match a set of men and women. The resulting matching must satisfy two properties: there is no unassigned person and there are no other assignments where two people of opposite gender prefer each other to their current assignments. We propose a new version of SM called as Robust Stable Marriage (RSM) by combining stability and robustness. We define robustness by introducing (a,b)-supermatches, which has been inspired by (a,b)-supermodels. An (a,b)-supermatch is a stable matching, where if at most a pairs want to break up, it is possible to find another stable matching by breaking at most b other pairs. Begum Genc, Mohamed Siala 0002, Barry O'Sullivan, Gilles Simonin |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2017 | On the Complexity of Robust Stable Marriage
Begum Genc, Mohamed Siala 0002, Gilles Simonin, Barry O'Sullivan |
COCOA (2) | 1 |
| 2017 | Finding Robust Solutions to Stable MarriageabstractWe study the notion of robustness in stable matching problems. We first define robustness by introducing (a,b)-supermatches. An (a,b)-supermatch is a stable matching in which if a pairs break up it is possible to find another stable matching by changing the partners of those a pairs and at most b other pairs. In this context, we define the most robust stable matching as a (1,b)-supermatch where b is minimum. We show that checking whether a given stable matching is a (1,b)-supermatch can be done in polynomial time. Next, we use this procedure to design a constraint programming model, a local search approach, and a genetic algorithm to find the most robust stable matching. Our empirical evaluation on large instances show that local search outperforms the other approaches. Begum Genc, Mohamed Siala 0002, Barry O'Sullivan, Gilles Simonin |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Improving Navigation in Critique GraphsabstractCritique graphs were introduced as a device for analysing the behaviour of conversational recommender systems. A conversational recommender allows a user to critique a recommended product with statements such as "I'd like a similar product to this one, but cheaper". A critique graph is a directed multigraph in which the nodes represent products, and a directed edge between a pair of products represents how a user can move from one product to another by tweaking a particular product feature. It has been shown that critique graphs are not symmetric: if a user critiques a product pi and is presented with product pj, critiquing product pj in the opposite manner does not necessarily return product pi. Furthermore, it might not be possible to reach all products in a catalogue starting from a given product, or as a consequence of a particular critique some products become unreachable. This latter point is quite unsatisfactory since a user would assume that it is possible to explore the full catalogue by critiquing alone. A number of approaches to overcoming this problem have been proposed in the literature. In this paper we propose a novel approach that exploits the critique graph directly. Specifically, the unreachability is a consequence of a critique graph having more than one strongly connected component. We show how the critique graph can be modified in a minor way, thereby modifying the semantics of critiquing for a given catalogue, so that all products are always reachable. Begum Genc, Barry O'Sullivan |
ICTAI | 1 |
| 2016 | An algorithm for automated layout of process description maps drawn in SBGNabstractMOTIVATION: Evolving technology has increased the focus on genomics. The combination of today's advanced techniques with decades of molecular biology research has yielded huge amounts of pathway data. A standard, named the Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN), was recently introduced to allow scientists to represent biological pathways in an unambiguous, easy-to-understand and efficient manner. Although there are a number of automated layout algorithms for various types of biological networks, currently none specialize on process description (PD) maps as defined by SBGN. RESULTS: We propose a new automated layout algorithm for PD maps drawn in SBGN. Our algorithm is based on a force-directed automated layout algorithm called Compound Spring Embedder (CoSE). On top of the existing force scheme, additional heuristics employing new types of forces and movement rules are defined to address SBGN-specific rules. Our algorithm is the only automatic layout algorithm that properly addresses all SBGN rules for drawing PD maps, including placement of substrates and products of process nodes on opposite sides, compact tiling of members of molecular complexes and extensively making use of nested structures (compound nodes) to properly draw cellular locations and molecular complex structures. As demonstrated experimentally, the algorithm results in significant improvements over use of a generic layout algorithm such as CoSE in addressing SBGN rules on top of commonly accepted graph drawing criteria. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation of our algorithm in Java is available within ChiLay library (https://github.com/iVis-at-Bilkent/chilay). CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Begum Genc, Ugur Dogrusoz |
Bioinform. | 1 |