Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roger Donaldson
dblp:166/1514
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 88% Data mining · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
group recommendation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016 |
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
implicit feedback |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016 |
Recommender systems › context-aware recommendation › dynamic recommendation
temporal preference modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matrix factorization · 0.2elastic-net regularization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix FactorizationabstractSocial networks often provide group features to help users with similar interests associate and consume content together. Recommending groups to users poses challenges due to their complex relationship: user-group affinity is typically measured implicitly and varies with time; similarly, group characteristics change as users join and leave. To tackle these challenges, we adapt existing matrix factorization techniques to learn user-group affinity based on two different implicit engagement metrics: (i) which group-provided content users consume; and (ii) which content users provide to groups. To capture the temporally extended nature of group engagement we implement a time-varying factorization. We test the assertion that latent preferences for groups and users are sparse in investigating elastic-net regularization. Experiments using data from DeviantArt indicate that the time-varying implicit engagement-based model provides the best top-K group recommendations, illustrating the benefit of the added model complexity. Xin Wang 0019, Roger Donaldson, Christopher Nell, Peter Gorniak, Martin Ester, Jiajun Bu |
AAAI | 2 |