Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roger Donaldson

dblp:166/1514 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 88% Data mining · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
group recommendation
0.212016
Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
implicit feedback
0.212016
Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016
Data mining
pattern mining
0.112016
Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016
Recommender systems › context-aware recommendation › dynamic recommendation
temporal preference modeling
0.112016
Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization · AAAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matrix factorization · 0.2elastic-net regularization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization
abstract
Social networks often provide group features to help users with similar interests associate and consume content together. Recommending groups to users poses challenges due to their complex relationship: user-group affinity is typically measured implicitly and varies with time; similarly, group characteristics change as users join and leave. To tackle these challenges, we adapt existing matrix factorization techniques to learn user-group affinity based on two different implicit engagement metrics: (i) which group-provided content users consume; and (ii) which content users provide to groups. To capture the temporally extended nature of group engagement we implement a time-varying factorization. We test the assertion that latent preferences for groups and users are sparse in investigating elastic-net regularization. Experiments using data from DeviantArt indicate that the time-varying implicit engagement-based model provides the best top-K group recommendations, illustrating the benefit of the added model complexity.
Xin Wang 0019, Roger Donaldson, Christopher Nell, Peter Gorniak, Martin Ester, Jiajun Bu
AAAI2