Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Konstantinos Koiliaris
dblp:166/1631
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 53% Mathematical optimization · 42% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 5% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 77% Recommender systems · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
subset sum |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Faster Pseudopolynomial Time Algorithms for Subset Sum · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2019 A Faster Pseudopolynomial Time Algorithm for Subset Sum · SODA 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.5 | 2 | 2019 | Faster Pseudopolynomial Time Algorithms for Subset Sum · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2019 A Faster Pseudopolynomial Time Algorithm for Subset Sum · SODA 2017 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | How do People Sort by Ratings? · CHI 2019 |
Usability and user experience research
user perception |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | How do People Sort by Ratings? · CHI 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › dynamic programming
pseudo-polynomial algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Faster Pseudopolynomial Time Algorithms for Subset Sum · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2019 |
Recommender systems
rating aggregation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | How do People Sort by Ratings? · CHI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical ordering · 0.8online study · 0.8crowd workers · 0.8modular arithmetic · 0.4dynamic programming · 0.4divide-and-conquer · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | How do People Sort by Ratings?abstractSorting items by user rating is a fundamental interaction pattern of the modern Web, used to rank products (Amazon), posts (Reddit), businesses (Yelp), movies (YouTube), and more. To implement this pattern, designers must take in a distribution of ratings for each item and define a sensible total ordering over them. This is a challenging problem, since each distribution is drawn from a distinct sample population, rendering the most straightforward method of sorting --- comparing averages --- unreliable when the samples are small or of different sizes. Several statistical orderings for binary ratings have been proposed in the literature (e.g., based on the Wilson score, or Laplace smoothing), each attempting to account for the uncertainty introduced by sampling. In this paper, we study this uncertainty through the lens of human perception, and ask "How do people sort by ratings?" In an online study, we collected 48,000 item-ranking pairs from 4,000 crowd workers along with 4,800 rationales, and analyzed the results to understand how users make decisions when comparing rated items. Our results shed light on the cognitive models users employ to choose between rating distributions, which sorts of comparisons are most contentious, and how the presentation of rating information affects users' preferences. Jerry O. Talton, Krishna Dusad, Konstantinos Koiliaris, Ranjitha Kumar |
CHI | 3 |
| 2019 | Faster Pseudopolynomial Time Algorithms for Subset SumabstractGiven a (multi) set S of n positive integers and a target integer u , the subset sum problem is to decide if there is a subset of S that sums up to u . We present a series of new algorithms that compute and return all the realizable subset sums up to the integer u in Õ(min { √ n u , u 5/4 ,σ }), where σ is the sum of all elements of S and Õ hides polylogarithmic factors. We also present a modified algorithm for integers modulo m , which computes all the realizable subset sums modulo m in Õ(min { √ n m , m 5/4 }) time. Our contributions improve upon the standard dynamic programming algorithm that runs in O ( nu ) time. To the best of our knowledge, the new algorithms are the fastest deterministic algorithms for this problem. The new results can be employed in various algorithmic problems, from graph bipartition to computational social choice. Finally, we also improve a result on covering Z m , which might be of independent interest. Konstantinos Koiliaris, Chao Xu 0002 |
ACM Trans. Algorithms | 1 |
| 2017 | A Faster Pseudopolynomial Time Algorithm for Subset SumabstractGiven a multiset S of n positive integers and a target integer t, the subset sum problem is to decide if there is a subset of S that sums up to t. We present a new divide-and-conquer algorithm that computes all the realizable subset sums up to an integer u in where σ is the sum of all elements in S and Õ hides polylogarithmic factors. This result improves upon the standard dynamic programming algorithm that runs in O(nu) time. To the best of our knowledge, the new algorithm is the fastest general deterministic algorithm for this problem. We also present a modified algorithm for finite cyclic groups, which computes all the realizable subset sums within the group in time, where m is the order of the group. Konstantinos Koiliaris, Chao Xu 0002 |
SODA | 1 |