One of the most important open problems in finite model theory is the question whether there is a logic characterising efficient computation. While this question usually concerns Ptime, it can also be applied to other complexity classes, and in particular to Logspace which can be seen as a formalisation of efficient computation for big data. One of the strongest candidates for a logic capturing Ptime is Choiceless Polynomial Time (CPT). It is based on the idea of choiceless algorithms, a general model of symmetric computation over abstract structures (rather than their encodings by finite strings). However, there is currently neither a comparably strong candidate for a logic for Logspace, nor a logic transferring the idea of choiceless computation to Logspace. We propose here a notion of Choiceless Logarithmic Space which overcomes some of the obstacles posed by Logspace as a less robust complexity class. The resulting logic is contained in both Logspace and CPT, and is strictly more expressive than all logics for Logspace that have been known so far. Further, we address the question whether this logic can define all Logspace-queries, and prove that this is not the case.

Choiceless Polynomial Time (CPT) is one of the most promising candidates in the search for a logic capturing P time . The question whether there is a logic that expresses exactly the polynomial-time computable properties of finite structures, which has been open for more than 30 years, is one of the most important and challenging problems in finite model theory. The strength of Choiceless Polynomial Time is its ability to perform isomorphism-invariant computations over structures, using hereditarily finite sets as data structures. But, because of isomorphism-invariance, it is choiceless in the sense that it cannot select an arbitrary element of a set—an operation that is crucial for many classical algorithms. CPT can define many interesting P time queries, including (a certain version of) the Cai-Fürer-Immerman (CFI) query. The CFI-query is particularly interesting, because it separates fixed-point logic with counting from P time and has since remained the main benchmark for the expressibility of logics within P time . The CFI-construction associates with each connected graph a set of CFI-graphs that can be partitioned into exactly two isomorphism classes called odd and even CFI-graphs. The problem is to decide, given a CFI-graph, whether it is odd or even. For the case where the CFI-graphs arise from ordered graphs, Dawar, Richerby, and Rossman proved that the CFI-query is CPT-definable. However, definability of the CFI-query over general graphs remains open. Our first contribution generalises the result by Dawar, Richerby, and Rossman to the variant of the CFI-query derived from graphs with colour classes of logarithmic size, instead of colour class size one. Second, we consider the CFI-query over graph classes where the maximal degree is linear in the size of the graphs. For the latter, we establish CPT-definability using only sets of small, constant rank, which is known to be impossible for the general case. In our CFI-recognising procedures we strongly make use of the ability of CPT to create sets, rather than tuples only, and we further prove that, if CPT worked over tuples instead, then no such procedure would be definable. We introduce a notion of “sequencelike objects” based on the structure of the graphs’ symmetry groups, and we show that no CPT-program that only uses sequencelike objects can decide the CFI-query over complete graphs, which have linear maximal degree. From a broader perspective, this generalises a result by Blass, Gurevich, and van den Bussche about the power of isomorphism-invariant machine models (for polynomial time) to a setting with counting.

Choiceless Polynomial Time (CPT) is one of the most promising candidates in the search for a logic capturing Ptime. The question whether there is a logic that expresses exactly the polynomial-time computable properties of finite structures, which has been open for more than 30 years, is one of the most important and challenging problems in finite model theory. The strength of Choiceless Polynomial Time is its ability to perform isomorphism-invariant computations over structures, using hereditarily finite sets as data structures. But, as it preserves symmetries, it is choiceless in the sense that it cannot select an arbitrary element of a set - an operation which is crucial for many classical algorithms. CPT can define many interesting Ptime queries, including (the original version of) the Cai-Fürer-Immerman (CFI) query. The CFI query is particularly interesting because it separates fixed-point logic with counting from Ptime, and has since remained the main benchmark for the expressibility of logics within Ptime. The CFI construction associates with each connected graph a set of CFI-graphs that can be partitioned into exactly two isomorphism classes called odd and even CFI-graphs. The problem is to decide, given a CFI-graph, whether it is odd or even. In the original version, the underlying graphs are linearly ordered, and for this case, Dawar, Richerby and Rossman proved that the CFI query is CPT-definable. However, the CFI query over general graphs remains one of the few known examples for which CPT-definability is open. Our first contribution generalises the result by Dawar, Richerby and Rossman to the variant of the CFI query where the underlying graphs have colour classes of logarithmic size, instead of colour class size one. Secondly, we consider the CFI query over graph classes where the maximal degree is linear in the size of the graphs. For these classes, we establish CPT-definability using only sets of small, constant rank, which is known to be impossible for the general case. In our CFI-recognising procedures we strongly make use of the ability of CPT to create sets, rather than tuples only, and we further prove that, if CPT worked over tuples instead, no such procedure would be definable. We introduce a notion of "sequence-like objects" based on the structure of the graphs' symmetry groups, and we show that no CPT-program which only uses sequence-like objects can decide the CFI query over complete graphs, which have linear maximal degree. From a broader perspective, this generalises a result by Blass, Gurevich, and van den Bussche about the power of isomorphism-invariant machine models (for polynomial time) to a setting with counting.

Choice less Polynomial Time (CPT) is one of the candidates in the quest for a logic for polynomial time. It is a strict extension of fixed-point logic with counting, but to date the question is open whether it expresses all polynomial-time properties of finite structures. We present here alternative characterisations of Choice less Polynomial Time (with and without counting) based on iterated first-order interpretations. The fundamental mechanism of Choice less Polynomial Time is the manipulation of hereditarily finite sets over the input structure by means of set-theoretic operations and comprehension terms. While this is very convenient and powerful for the design of abstract computations on structures, it makes the analysis of the expressive power of CPT rather difficult. We aim to reduce this functional framework operating on higher-order objects to an approach that evaluates formulae on less complex objects. We propose a more model-theoretic formalism, called polynomial-time interpretation logic (PIL), that replaces the machinery of hereditarily finite sets and comprehension terms by traditional first-order interpretations, and handles counting by Härtig quantifiers. In our framework, computations on finite structures are captured by iterations of interpretations, and a run is a sequence of states, each of which is a finite structure of a fixed vocabulary. Our main result is that PIL has precisely the same expressive power as Choice less Polynomial Time. We also analyse the structure of PIL and show that many of the logical formalisms or database languages that have been proposed in the quest for a logic for polynomial time reappear as fragments of PIL, obtained by restricting interpretations in a natural way (e.g. By omitting congruences or using only one-dimensional interpretations).