Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luis Cebamanos

dblp:166/4620 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-6594-211XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 77% High-performance computing · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › complex trait genetics
complex trait analysis
0.212014
Regional heritability advanced complex trait analysis for GPU and traditional parallel architectures · Bioinform. 2014
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing
0.212014
Regional heritability advanced complex trait analysis for GPU and traditional parallel architectures · Bioinform. 2014
High-performance computing
supercomputing
0.112014
Regional heritability advanced complex trait analysis for GPU and traditional parallel architectures · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

restricted maximum likelihood · 0.4genetic relationship matrix · 0.4GPU acceleration · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata
Anton Shterenlikht, Luis Cebamanos
Parallel Comput.2
2018 Cellular automata beyond 100k cores: MPI vs Fortran coarrays
abstract
Fortran coarrays are an attractive alternative to MPI due to a familiar Fortran syntax, single sided communications and implementation in the compiler. Scaling of coarrays is compared in this work to MPI, using cellular automata (CA) 3D Ising magnetisation miniapps, built with the CASUP CA library, https://cgpack.sourceforge.io, developed by the authors. Ising energy and magnetisation were calculated with MPI_ALLREDUCE and Fortran 2018 co_sum collectives. The work was done on ARCHER (Cray XC30) up to the full machine capacity: 109,056 cores. Ping-pong latency and bandwidth results are very similar with MPI and with coarrays for message sizes from 1B to several MB. MPI halo exchange (HX) scaled better than coarray HX, which is surprising because both algorithms use pair-wise communications: MPI IRECV/ISEND/WAITALL vs Fortran sync images. Adding OpenMP to MPI or to coarrays resulted in worse L2 cache hit ratio, and lower performance in all cases, even though the NUMA effects were ruled out. This is likely because the CA algorithm is memory and network bound. The sampling and tracing analysis shows good load balancing in compute in all miniapps, but imbalance in communication, indicating that the difference in performance between MPI and coarrays is likely due to parallel libraries (MPICH2 vs libpgas) and the Cray hardware specific libraries (uGNI vs DMAPP). Overall, the results look promising for coarray use beyond 100k cores. However, further coarray optimisation is needed to narrow the performance gap between coarrays and MPI.
Anton Shterenlikht, Luis Cebamanos
EuroMPI2
2014 Regional heritability advanced complex trait analysis for GPU and traditional parallel architectures
abstract
MOTIVATION: Quantification of the contribution of genetic variation to phenotypic variation for complex traits becomes increasingly computationally demanding with increasing numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and individuals. To meet the challenges in making feasible large-scale studies, we present the REgional heritability advanced complex trait analysis software. Adapted from advanced complex trait analysis (and, in turn, genome-wide complex trait analysis), it is tailored to exploit the parallelism present in modern traditional and graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated machines, from workstations to supercomputers. RESULTS: We adapt the genetic relationship matrix estimation algorithm to remove limitations on memory, allowing the analysis of large datasets. We build on this to develop a version of the code able to efficiently exploit GPU-accelerated systems for both the genetic relationship matrix and REstricted maximum likelihood (REML) parts of the analysis, offering substantial speedup over the traditional central processing unit version. We develop the ability to analyze multiple small regions of the genome across multiple compute nodes in parallel, following the 'regional heritability' approach. We demonstrate the new software using 1024 GPUs in parallel on one of the world's fastest supercomputers. AVAILABILITY: The code is freely available at http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/software-products CONTACT: [email protected].
Luis Cebamanos, Alan Gray, I. Stewart, Albert Tenesa
Bioinform.1