Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marco Federici
dblp:166/5511
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 31% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximization · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › dataset bias
selection bias |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › information bottleneck
multi-view information bottleneck |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Robust Representations via Multi-View Information Bottleneck · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximization · ICLR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information bottleneck · 1.2dimensionality reduction · 0.8variational inference · 0.7expectation-maximization · 0.7information-theoretic analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Latent Representation and Simulation of Markov Processes via Time-Lagged Information BottleneckabstractMarkov processes are widely used mathematical models for describing dynamic systems in various fields. However, accurately simulating large-scale systems at long time scales is computationally expensive due to the short time steps required for accurate integration. In this paper, we introduce an inference process that maps complex systems into a simplified representational space and models large jumps in time. To achieve this, we propose Time-lagged Information Bottleneck (T-IB), a principled objective rooted in information theory, which aims to capture relevant temporal features while discarding high-frequency information to simplify the simulation task and minimize the inference error. Our experiments demonstrate that T-IB learns information-optimal representations for accurately modeling the statistical properties and dynamics of the original process at a selected time lag, outperforming existing time-lagged dimensionality reduction methods. Marco Federici, Patrick Forré, Ryota Tomioka, Bastiaan S. Veeling |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximization
Cheems Wang, Marco Federici, Herke van Hoof |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution ShiftsabstractSafely deploying machine learning models to the real world is often a challenging process. For example, models trained with data obtained from a specific geographic location tend to fail when queried with data obtained elsewhere, agents trained in a simulation can struggle to adapt when deployed in the real world or novel environments, and neural networks that are fit to a subset of the population might carry some selection bias into their decision process.In this work, we describe the problem of data shift from an information-theoretic perspective by (i) identifying and describing the different sources of error, (ii) comparing some of the most promising objectives explored in the recent domain generalization and fair classification literature. From our theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation, we conclude that the model selection procedure needs to be guided by careful considerations regarding the observed data, the factors used for correction, and the structure of the data-generating process. Marco Federici, Ryota Tomioka, Patrick Forré |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Learning Robust Representations via Multi-View Information Bottleneck
Marco Federici, Anjan Dutta 0001, Patrick Forré, Nate Kushman, Zeynep Akata |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | An unsupervised aspect extraction strategy for monitoring real-time reviews stream
Mauro Dragoni, Marco Federici, Andi Rexha |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 2 |
| 2018 | Genetic algorithms for hyperparameter optimization in predictive business process monitoring
Chiara Di Francescomarino, Marlon Dumas, Marco Federici, Chiara Ghidini, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Williams Rizzi, Luca Simonetto |
Inf. Syst. | 3 |
| 2016 | Predictive Business Process Monitoring Framework with Hyperparameter Optimization
Chiara Di Francescomarino, Marlon Dumas, Marco Federici, Chiara Ghidini, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Williams Rizzi |
CAiSE | 3 |