Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marco Federici

dblp:166/5511 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 31% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes
0.712023
Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximization · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization
0.512021
An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.512021
An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift
0.512021
An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › dataset bias
selection bias
0.512021
An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › information bottleneck
multi-view information bottleneck
0.412020
Learning Robust Representations via Multi-View Information Bottleneck · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization
0.212023
Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximization · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information bottleneck · 1.2dimensionality reduction · 0.8variational inference · 0.7expectation-maximization · 0.7information-theoretic analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Latent Representation and Simulation of Markov Processes via Time-Lagged Information Bottleneck
abstract
Markov processes are widely used mathematical models for describing dynamic systems in various fields. However, accurately simulating large-scale systems at long time scales is computationally expensive due to the short time steps required for accurate integration. In this paper, we introduce an inference process that maps complex systems into a simplified representational space and models large jumps in time. To achieve this, we propose Time-lagged Information Bottleneck (T-IB), a principled objective rooted in information theory, which aims to capture relevant temporal features while discarding high-frequency information to simplify the simulation task and minimize the inference error. Our experiments demonstrate that T-IB learns information-optimal representations for accurately modeling the statistical properties and dynamics of the original process at a selected time lag, outperforming existing time-lagged dimensionality reduction methods.
Marco Federici, Patrick Forré, Ryota Tomioka, Bastiaan S. Veeling
ICLR1
2023 Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximization
Cheems Wang, Marco Federici, Herke van Hoof
ICLR2
2021 An Information-theoretic Approach to Distribution Shifts
abstract
Safely deploying machine learning models to the real world is often a challenging process. For example, models trained with data obtained from a specific geographic location tend to fail when queried with data obtained elsewhere, agents trained in a simulation can struggle to adapt when deployed in the real world or novel environments, and neural networks that are fit to a subset of the population might carry some selection bias into their decision process.In this work, we describe the problem of data shift from an information-theoretic perspective by (i) identifying and describing the different sources of error, (ii) comparing some of the most promising objectives explored in the recent domain generalization and fair classification literature. From our theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation, we conclude that the model selection procedure needs to be guided by careful considerations regarding the observed data, the factors used for correction, and the structure of the data-generating process.
Marco Federici, Ryota Tomioka, Patrick Forré
NeurIPS1
2020 Learning Robust Representations via Multi-View Information Bottleneck
Marco Federici, Anjan Dutta 0001, Patrick Forré, Nate Kushman, Zeynep Akata
ICLR1
2019 An unsupervised aspect extraction strategy for monitoring real-time reviews stream
Mauro Dragoni, Marco Federici, Andi Rexha
Inf. Process. Manag.2
2018 Genetic algorithms for hyperparameter optimization in predictive business process monitoring
Chiara Di Francescomarino, Marlon Dumas, Marco Federici, Chiara Ghidini, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Williams Rizzi, Luca Simonetto
Inf. Syst.3
2016 Predictive Business Process Monitoring Framework with Hyperparameter Optimization
Chiara Di Francescomarino, Marlon Dumas, Marco Federici, Chiara Ghidini, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Williams Rizzi
CAiSE3