Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luxi Jiang
dblp:167/0215
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Borrowing from the Crowd: A Study of Recombination in Software Design Competitions · ICSE (1) 2015 |
Empirical software engineering
crowdsourcing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Borrowing from the Crowd: A Study of Recombination in Software Design Competitions · ICSE (1) 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
design competition study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Non-negative consistency affinity graph learning for unsupervised feature selection and clustering
Luxi Jiang, Xingyu Zhu 0008, Xiuhong Chen |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2015 | Borrowing from the Crowd: A Study of Recombination in Software Design CompetitionsabstractOne form of crowdsourcing is the competition, which poses an open call for competing solutions. Commercial systems such as TopCoder have begun to explore the application of competitions to software development, but have important limitations diminishing the potential benefits drawn from the crowd. In particular, they employ a model of independent work that ignores the opportunity for designs to arise from the ideas of multiple designers. In this paper, we examine the potential for software design competitions to incorporate recombination, in which competing designers are given the designs of others and encouraged to use them to revise their own designs. To explore this, we conducted two software design competitions in which participants were asked to produce both an initial and a revised design, drawing on lessons learned from the crowd. We found that, in both competitions, all participants borrowed ideas and most improved the quality of their designs. Our findings demonstrate the potential benefits of recombination in software design and suggest several ways in which software design competitions can be improved. Thomas D. LaToza, Micky Chen, Luxi Jiang, Mengyao Zhao, André van der Hoek |
ICSE (1) | 3 |