Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luxi Jiang

dblp:167/0215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing
0.212015
Borrowing from the Crowd: A Study of Recombination in Software Design Competitions · ICSE (1) 2015
Empirical software engineering
crowdsourcing
0.212015
Borrowing from the Crowd: A Study of Recombination in Software Design Competitions · ICSE (1) 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

design competition study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Non-negative consistency affinity graph learning for unsupervised feature selection and clustering
Luxi Jiang, Xingyu Zhu 0008, Xiuhong Chen
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.2
2015 Borrowing from the Crowd: A Study of Recombination in Software Design Competitions
abstract
One form of crowdsourcing is the competition, which poses an open call for competing solutions. Commercial systems such as TopCoder have begun to explore the application of competitions to software development, but have important limitations diminishing the potential benefits drawn from the crowd. In particular, they employ a model of independent work that ignores the opportunity for designs to arise from the ideas of multiple designers. In this paper, we examine the potential for software design competitions to incorporate recombination, in which competing designers are given the designs of others and encouraged to use them to revise their own designs. To explore this, we conducted two software design competitions in which participants were asked to produce both an initial and a revised design, drawing on lessons learned from the crowd. We found that, in both competitions, all participants borrowed ideas and most improved the quality of their designs. Our findings demonstrate the potential benefits of recombination in software design and suggest several ways in which software design competitions can be improved.
Thomas D. LaToza, Micky Chen, Luxi Jiang, Mengyao Zhao, André van der Hoek
ICSE (1)3