Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Carol Zhou
dblp:167/0680
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › viral genomics
phage genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted graph · 0.4dynamic programming · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomesabstractMOTIVATION: Currently there are no tools specifically designed for annotating genes in phages. Several tools are available that have been adapted to run on phage genomes, but due to their underlying design, they are unable to capture the full complexity of phage genomes. Phages have adapted their genomes to be extremely compact, having adjacent genes that overlap and genes completely inside of other longer genes. This non-delineated genome structure makes it difficult for gene prediction using the currently available gene annotators. Here we present PHANOTATE, a novel method for gene calling specifically designed for phage genomes. Although the compact nature of genes in phages is a problem for current gene annotators, we exploit this property by treating a phage genome as a network of paths: where open reading frames are favorable, and overlaps and gaps are less favorable, but still possible. We represent this network of connections as a weighted graph, and use dynamic programing to find the optimal path. RESULTS: We compare PHANOTATE to other gene callers by annotating a set of 2133 complete phage genomes from GenBank, using PHANOTATE and the three most popular gene callers. We found that the four programs agree on 82% of the total predicted genes, with PHANOTATE predicting more genes than the other three. We searched for these extra genes in both GenBank's non-redundant protein database and all of the metagenomes in the sequence read archive, and found that they are present at levels that suggest that these are functional protein-coding genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/deprekate/PHANOTATE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Katelyn McNair, Carol Zhou, Elizabeth A. Dinsdale, Brian Souza, Robert A. Edwards |
Bioinform. | 2 |