Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chulmoo Kang

dblp:167/0963 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene text spotting
0.312017
Detection and Recognition of Text Embedded in Online Images via Neural Context Models · AAAI 2017
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › scene text spotting
text detection and recognition
0.312017
Detection and Recognition of Text Embedded in Online Images via Neural Context Models · AAAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural context model · 0.6metadata exploitation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Detection and Recognition of Text Embedded in Online Images via Neural Context Models
abstract
We address the problem of detecting and recognizing the text embedded in online images that are circulated over the Web. Our idea is to leverage context information for both text detection and recognition. For detection, we use local image context around the text region, based on that the text often sequentially appear in online images. For recognition, we exploit the metadata associated with the input online image, including tags, comments, and title, which are used as a topic prior for the word candidates in the image. To infuse such two sets of context information, we propose a contextual text spotting network (CTSN). We perform comparative evaluation with five state-of-the-art text spotting methods on newly collected Instagram and Flickr datasets. We show that our approach that benefits from context information is more successful for text spotting in online images.
Chulmoo Kang, Gunhee Kim, Suk I. Yoo
AAAI1