Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chulmoo Kang
dblp:167/0963
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene text spotting |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Detection and Recognition of Text Embedded in Online Images via Neural Context Models · AAAI 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › scene text spotting
text detection and recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Detection and Recognition of Text Embedded in Online Images via Neural Context Models · AAAI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural context model · 0.6metadata exploitation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Detection and Recognition of Text Embedded in Online Images via Neural Context ModelsabstractWe address the problem of detecting and recognizing the text embedded in online images that are circulated over the Web. Our idea is to leverage context information for both text detection and recognition. For detection, we use local image context around the text region, based on that the text often sequentially appear in online images. For recognition, we exploit the metadata associated with the input online image, including tags, comments, and title, which are used as a topic prior for the word candidates in the image. To infuse such two sets of context information, we propose a contextual text spotting network (CTSN). We perform comparative evaluation with five state-of-the-art text spotting methods on newly collected Instagram and Flickr datasets. We show that our approach that benefits from context information is more successful for text spotting in online images. Chulmoo Kang, Gunhee Kim, Suk I. Yoo |
AAAI | 1 |