Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Paul Börding

dblp:167/7849 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices
service discovery
0.212015
Comprehensive service matching with MatchBox · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015
Services computing and microservices › service discovery
service matching
0.212015
Comprehensive service matching with MatchBox · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

service matcher integration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 JMCTest: Automatically Testing Inter-Method Contracts in Java
Paul Börding, Jan Haltermann, Marie-Christine Jakobs, Heike Wehrheim
ICTSS1
2015 Comprehensive service matching with MatchBox
abstract
Nowadays, many service providers offer software components in the form of Software as a Service. Requesters that want to discover those services in order to use or to integrate them, need to find out which service satisfies their requirements best. For this purpose, service matching approaches determine how well the specifications of provided services satisfy their requirements (including structural, behavioral, and non-functional requirements). In this paper, we describe the tool-suite MatchBox that allows the integration of existing service matchers and their combination as part of flexibly configurable matching processes. Taking requirements and service specifications as an input, MatchBox is able to execute such matching processes and deliver rich matching results. In contrast to related tools, MatchBox allows users to take into account many different kinds of requirements, while it also provides the flexibility to control the matching process in many different ways.
Paul Börding, Melanie Bruns, Marie Platenius-Mohr
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1