Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christoffer Rosen
dblp:167/7850
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 56% Software maintenance and evolution · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software quality assurance
software quality prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015 |
Empirical software engineering
software analytics |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prediction modeling · 0.2git mining · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | What are mobile developers asking about? A large scale study using stack overflow
Christoffer Rosen, Emad Shihab |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 1 |
| 2015 | Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commitsabstractSoftware quality is one of the most important research sub-areas of software engineering. Hence, a plethora of research has focused on the prediction of software quality. Much of the software analytics and prediction work has proposed metrics, models and novel approaches that can predict quality with high levels of accuracy. However, adoption of such techniques remain low; one of the reasons for this low adoption of the current analytics and prediction technique is the lack of actionable and publicly available tools. We present Commit Guru, a language agnostic analytics and prediction tool that identifies and predicts risky software commits. Commit Guru is publicly available and is able to mine any GIT SCM repository. Analytics are generated at both, the project and commit levels. In addition, Commit Guru automatically identifies risky (i.e., bug-inducing) commits and builds a prediction model that assess the likelihood of a recent commit introducing a bug in the future. Finally, to facilitate future research in the area, users of Commit Guru can download the data for any project that is processed by Commit Guru with a single click. Several large open source projects have been successfully processed using Commit Guru. Commit Guru is available online at commit.guru. Our source code is also released freely under the MIT license. Christoffer Rosen, Ben Grawi, Emad Shihab |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |