Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christoffer Rosen

dblp:167/7850 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 56% Software maintenance and evolution · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.212015
Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015
Software maintenance and evolution › software quality assurance
software quality prediction
0.212015
Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015
Empirical software engineering
software analytics
0.112015
Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prediction modeling · 0.2git mining · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 What are mobile developers asking about? A large scale study using stack overflow
Christoffer Rosen, Emad Shihab
Empir. Softw. Eng.1
2015 Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits
abstract
Software quality is one of the most important research sub-areas of software engineering. Hence, a plethora of research has focused on the prediction of software quality. Much of the software analytics and prediction work has proposed metrics, models and novel approaches that can predict quality with high levels of accuracy. However, adoption of such techniques remain low; one of the reasons for this low adoption of the current analytics and prediction technique is the lack of actionable and publicly available tools. We present Commit Guru, a language agnostic analytics and prediction tool that identifies and predicts risky software commits. Commit Guru is publicly available and is able to mine any GIT SCM repository. Analytics are generated at both, the project and commit levels. In addition, Commit Guru automatically identifies risky (i.e., bug-inducing) commits and builds a prediction model that assess the likelihood of a recent commit introducing a bug in the future. Finally, to facilitate future research in the area, users of Commit Guru can download the data for any project that is processed by Commit Guru with a single click. Several large open source projects have been successfully processed using Commit Guru. Commit Guru is available online at commit.guru. Our source code is also released freely under the MIT license.
Christoffer Rosen, Ben Grawi, Emad Shihab
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1