Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julien Boudet

dblp:168/1177 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
automated peak picking
0.212015
Computer vision-based automated peak picking applied to protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
NMR spectroscopy
0.212015
Computer vision-based automated peak picking applied to protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.212015
Computer vision-based automated peak picking applied to protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure determination
0.112015
Computer vision-based automated peak picking applied to protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

computer vision · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Computer vision-based automated peak picking applied to protein NMR spectra
abstract
MOTIVATION: A detailed analysis of multidimensional NMR spectra of macromolecules requires the identification of individual resonances (peaks). This task can be tedious and time-consuming and often requires support by experienced users. Automated peak picking algorithms were introduced more than 25 years ago, but there are still major deficiencies/flaws that often prevent complete and error free peak picking of biological macromolecule spectra. The major challenges of automated peak picking algorithms is both the distinction of artifacts from real peaks particularly from those with irregular shapes and also picking peaks in spectral regions with overlapping resonances which are very hard to resolve by existing computer algorithms. In both of these cases a visual inspection approach could be more effective than a 'blind' algorithm. RESULTS: We present a novel approach using computer vision (CV) methodology which could be better adapted to the problem of peak recognition. After suitable 'training' we successfully applied the CV algorithm to spectra of medium-sized soluble proteins up to molecular weights of 26 kDa and to a 130 kDa complex of a tetrameric membrane protein in detergent micelles. Our CV approach outperforms commonly used programs. With suitable training datasets the application of the presented method can be extended to automated peak picking in multidimensional spectra of nucleic acids or carbohydrates and adapted to solid-state NMR spectra. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CV-Peak Picker is available upon request from the authors. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Piotr Klukowski, Michal J. Walczak, Adam Gonczarek, Julien Boudet, Gerhard Wider
Bioinform.4