Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrea Byrnes
dblp:168/1229
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic association study
genetic association testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Likelihood-based complex trait association testing for arbitrary depth sequencing data · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score test · 0.2likelihood ratio test · 0.2genotype likelihood function · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Likelihood-based complex trait association testing for arbitrary depth sequencing dataabstractUNLABELLED: In next generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic studies, researchers typically perform genotype calling first and then apply standard genotype-based methods for association testing. However, such a two-step approach ignores genotype calling uncertainty in the association testing step and may incur power loss and/or inflated type-I error. In the recent literature, a few robust and efficient likelihood based methods including both likelihood ratio test (LRT) and score test have been proposed to carry out association testing without intermediate genotype calling. These methods take genotype calling uncertainty into account by directly incorporating genotype likelihood function (GLF) of NGS data into association analysis. However, existing LRT methods are computationally demanding or do not allow covariate adjustment; while existing score tests are not applicable to markers with low minor allele frequency (MAF). We provide an LRT allowing flexible covariate adjustment, develop a statistically more powerful score test and propose a combination strategy (UNC combo) to leverage the advantages of both tests. We have carried out extensive simulations to evaluate the performance of our proposed LRT and score test. Simulations and real data analysis demonstrate the advantages of our proposed combination strategy: it offers a satisfactory trade-off in terms of computational efficiency, applicability (accommodating both common variants and variants with low MAF) and statistical power, particularly for the analysis of quantitative trait where the power gain can be up to ∼60% when the causal variant is of low frequency (MAF < 0.01). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: UNC combo and the associated R files, including documentation, examples, are available at http://www.unc.edu/∼yunmli/UNCcombo/ CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Zheng Xu 0010, Baqun Zhang, Guolian Kang, Andrea Byrnes |
Bioinform. | 7 |