Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuo Xie
dblp:168/1948
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 64% Learning theory · 19% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 56% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 44% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adam |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adam Exploits ℓ∞-geometry of Loss Landscape via Coordinate-wise Adaptivity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › performative prediction
strategic classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification? · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › strategic behavior
strategic classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adamw |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Implicit Bias of AdamW: ℓ∞-Norm Constrained Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
implicit bias |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Implicit Bias of AdamW: ℓ∞-Norm Constrained Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
online learning regret |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
shampoo · 1.7regret analysis · 1.7online learning · 1.7kronecker-factored preconditioner · 1.7coordinate-wise adaptivity · 1.7adagrad · 1.7l∞-norm constrained optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MPPO: Multi Pair-wise Preference Optimization for LLMs with Arbitrary Negative SamplesabstractAligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human feedback is crucial for their development. Existing preference optimization methods such as DPO and KTO, while improved based on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), are inherently derived from PPO, requiring a reference model that adds GPU memory resources and relies heavily on abundant preference data. Meanwhile, current preference optimization research mainly targets single-question scenarios with two replies, neglecting optimization with multiple replies, which leads to a waste of data in the application. This study introduces the MPPO algorithm, which leverages the average likelihood of model responses to fit the reward function and maximizes the utilization of preference data. Through a comparison of Point-wise, Pair-wise, and List-wise implementations, we found that the Pair-wise approach achieves the best performance, significantly enhancing the quality of model responses. Experimental results demonstrate MPPO’s outstanding performance across various benchmarks. On MT-Bench, MPPO outperforms DPO, ORPO, and SimPO. Notably, on Arena-Hard, MPPO surpasses DPO and ORPO by substantial margins. These achievements underscore the remarkable advantages of MPPO in preference optimization tasks. Shuo Xie, Fangzhi Zhu, Lulu Wen, Xiaowei Chen 0016, Junxiong Zhu, Bo Zheng 0007 |
COLING | 1 |
| 2025 | Adam Exploits ℓ∞-geometry of Loss Landscape via Coordinate-wise Adaptivity
Shuo Xie, Mohamad Amin Mohamadi |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?abstractStrategic classification addresses a learning problem where a decision-maker implements a classifier over agents who may manipulate their features in order to receive favorable predictions. In the standard model of online strategic classification, in each round, the decision-maker implements and publicly reveals a classifier, after which agents perfectly best respond based on this knowledge. However, in practice, whether to disclose the classifier is often debated—some decision-makers believe that hiding the classifier can prevent misclassification errors caused by manipulation. In this paper, we formally examine how limiting the agents’ access to the current classifier affects the decision-maker’s performance. Specifically, we consider an extended online strategic classification setting where agents lack direct knowledge about the current classifier and instead manipulate based on a weighted average of historically implemented classifiers. Our main result shows that in this setting, the decision-maker incurs $(1-\gamma)^{-1}$ or $k_{\text{in}}$ times more mistakes compared to the full-knowledge setting, where $k_{\text{in}}$ is the maximum in-degree of the manipulation graph (representing how many distinct feature vectors can be manipulated to appear as a single one), and $\gamma$ is the discount factor indicating agents’ memory of past classifiers. Our results demonstrate how withholding access to the classifier can backfire and degrade the decision-maker’s performance in online strategic classification. Han Shao 0001, Shuo Xie, Kunhe Yang |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified AnalysisabstractWe present a novel unified analysis for a broad class of adaptive optimization algorithms with structured (e.g., layerwise, diagonal, and kronecker-factored) preconditioners for both online regret minimization and offline convex optimization. Our analysis not only provides matching rate to several important structured preconditioned algorithms including diagonal AdaGrad, full-matrix AdaGrad, and AdaGrad-Norm, but also gives an improved convergence rate for a one-sided variant of Shampoo over that of original Shampoo. Interestingly, more structured preconditioners (e.g., diagonal Adagrad, AdaGrad-Norm which use less space and compute) are often presented as computationally efficient approximations to full-matrix Adagrad, aiming for improved optimization performance through better approximations. Our unified analysis challenges this prevailing view and reveals, perhaps surprisingly, that more structured preconditioners, despite using less space and computation per step, can outperform their less structured counterparts. To demonstrate this, we show that one-sided Shampoo, which is relatively much cheaper than full-matrix AdaGrad could outperform it both theoretically and experimentally. Shuo Xie, Tianhao Wang 0017, Sashank J. Reddi, Sanjiv Kumar, Zhiyuan Li 0005 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Unsupervised Extremely Low-Light Image Enhancement with a Laplacian Pyramid Network
Shuo Xie |
ICIC (8) | 2 |
| 2024 | Implicit Bias of AdamW: ℓ∞-Norm Constrained Optimization
Shuo Xie |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | A 94.1% Efficiency 20-180W GaN-Based Full-Bridge Wireless Power Receiver for High-Power Wireless ChargersabstractIn this paper, a 6.78MHz GaN-based full-bridge active rectifier with enhanced power conversion efficiency (PCE) and voltage conversion ratio (VCR) is proposed. The design features a bootstrap driver to actively switch the high-side GaN transistors, as well as real-time calibration loops to automatically compensate the circuit delays in the low-side control paths, such that the PCE and VCR are maximized with eliminated reverse current and optimal conduction time. The proposed active rectifier is designed and simulated in a 180nm BCD process, and verified under process, voltage and temperature (PVT) variations with power capacity from 20 to 180 W. Thanks to the proposed calibration loops, up to 25% and 20% PCE and VCR improvements, respectively, are observed under various PVT and loading conditions, with a peak PCE of 94.1% at 90-W output power and a peak VCR at 98% at 20-W output power. Shuo Xie, Junyao Tang, Cheng Huang 0004 |
ISCAS | 1 |
| 2020 | A composite learning method for multi-ship collision avoidance based on reinforcement learning and inverse control
Shuo Xie, Xiumin Chu, Mao Zheng |
Neurocomputing | 1 |