Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anthony Potter
dblp:168/4997
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-9844-4798ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 91% Data models and query languages · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization › join processing
distributed join |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Query processing and optimization › query planning
distributed query planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Query processing and optimization
query planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Data models and query languages › semistructured data
RDF data |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph partitioning · 0.3flow control · 0.3dynamic data shuffling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF StoresabstractWhen RDF datasets become too large to be managed by centralised systems, they are often distributed in a cluster of shared-nothing servers, and queries are answered using a distributed join algorithm. Although such solutions have been extensively studied in relational and RDF databases, we argue that existing approaches exhibit two drawbacks. First, they usually decide statically(i.e., at query compile time) how to shuffle the data, which can lead to missed opportunities for local computation. Second, they often materialise large intermediate relations whose size is determined by the entire dataset (and not the data stored in each server), so these relations can easily exceed the memory of individual servers. As a possible remedy, we present a novel distributed join algorithm for RDF. Our approach decides when to shuffle data dynamically, which ensures that query answers that can be wholly produced within a server involve only local computation. It also uses a novel flow control mechanism to ensure that every query can be answered even if each server has a bounded amount of memory that is much smaller than the intermediate relations. We complement our algorithm with a new query planning approach that balances the cost of communication against the cost of local processing at each server. Moreover, as in several existing approaches, we distribute RDF data using graph partitioning so as to maximise local computation, but we refine the partitioning algorithm to produce more balanced partitions. We show empirically that our techniques can outperform the state of the art by orders of magnitude in terms of query evaluation times, network communication, and memory use. In particular, bounding the memory use in individual servers can mean the difference between success and failure for answering queries with large answer sets. Anthony Potter, Boris Motik, Yavor Nenov, Ian Horrocks 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 2016 | Distributed RDF Query Answering with Dynamic Data Exchange
Anthony Potter, Boris Motik, Yavor Nenov, Ian Horrocks 0001 |
ISWC (1) | 1 |