Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anthony Potter

dblp:168/4997 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-9844-4798ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 91% Data models and query languages · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization › join processing
distributed join
0.312018
Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018
Query processing and optimization › query planning
distributed query planning
0.312018
Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018
Query processing and optimization
query planning
0.312018
Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018
Data models and query languages › semistructured data
RDF data
0.112018
Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph partitioning · 0.3flow control · 0.3dynamic data shuffling · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Dynamic Data Exchange in Distributed RDF Stores
abstract
When RDF datasets become too large to be managed by centralised systems, they are often distributed in a cluster of shared-nothing servers, and queries are answered using a distributed join algorithm. Although such solutions have been extensively studied in relational and RDF databases, we argue that existing approaches exhibit two drawbacks. First, they usually decide statically(i.e., at query compile time) how to shuffle the data, which can lead to missed opportunities for local computation. Second, they often materialise large intermediate relations whose size is determined by the entire dataset (and not the data stored in each server), so these relations can easily exceed the memory of individual servers. As a possible remedy, we present a novel distributed join algorithm for RDF. Our approach decides when to shuffle data dynamically, which ensures that query answers that can be wholly produced within a server involve only local computation. It also uses a novel flow control mechanism to ensure that every query can be answered even if each server has a bounded amount of memory that is much smaller than the intermediate relations. We complement our algorithm with a new query planning approach that balances the cost of communication against the cost of local processing at each server. Moreover, as in several existing approaches, we distribute RDF data using graph partitioning so as to maximise local computation, but we refine the partitioning algorithm to produce more balanced partitions. We show empirically that our techniques can outperform the state of the art by orders of magnitude in terms of query evaluation times, network communication, and memory use. In particular, bounding the memory use in individual servers can mean the difference between success and failure for answering queries with large answer sets.
Anthony Potter, Boris Motik, Yavor Nenov, Ian Horrocks 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2016 Distributed RDF Query Answering with Dynamic Data Exchange
Anthony Potter, Boris Motik, Yavor Nenov, Ian Horrocks 0001
ISWC (1)1