Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Naman Saxena

dblp:168/7130 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 72% Legged, aerial and field robots · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
quadruped locomotion
0.912025
PIP-Loco: A Proprioceptive Infinite Horizon Planning Framework for Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods
0.712023
Off-Policy Average Reward Actor-Critic with Deterministic Policy Search · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › average-reward reinforcement learning
average reward
0.712023
Off-Policy Average Reward Actor-Critic with Deterministic Policy Search · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization › policy gradient
deterministic policy gradient
0.712023
Off-Policy Average Reward Actor-Critic with Deterministic Policy Search · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.312025
PIP-Loco: A Proprioceptive Infinite Horizon Planning Framework for Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

velocity estimator · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9model predictive control · 0.9dreamer · 0.9stochastic approximation · 0.7ODE-based convergence analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PIP-Loco: A Proprioceptive Infinite Horizon Planning Framework for Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion
abstract
A core strength of Model Predictive Control (MPC) for quadrupedal locomotion has been its ability to enforce constraints and provide interpretability of the sequence of commands over the horizon. However, despite being able to plan, MPC struggles to scale with task complexity, often failing to achieve robust behavior on rapidly changing surfaces. On the other hand, model-free Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods have outperformed MPC on multiple terrains, showing emergent motions but inherently lack any ability to handle constraints or perform planning. To address these limitations, we propose a framework that integrates proprioceptive planning with RL, allowing for agile and safe locomotion behaviors through the horizon. Inspired by MPC, we incorporate an internal model that includes a velocity estimator and a Dreamer module. During training, the framework learns an expert policy and an internal model that are co-dependent, facilitating exploration for improved locomotion behaviors. During deployment, the Dreamer module solves an infinite-horizon MPC problem, adapting actions and velocity commands to respect the constraints. We validate the robustness of our training framework through ablation studies on internal model components and demonstrate improved robustness to training noise. Finally, we evaluate our approach across multi-terrain scenarios in both simulation and hardware.
Aditya Shirwatkar, Naman Saxena, Kishore Chandra, Shishir Kolathaya
ICRA2
2023 Off-Policy Average Reward Actor-Critic with Deterministic Policy Search
abstract
The average reward criterion is relatively less studied as most existing works in the Reinforcement Learning literature consider the discounted reward criterion. There are few recent works that present on-policy average reward actor-critic algorithms, but average reward off-policy actor-critic is relatively less explored. In this work, we present both on-policy and off-policy deterministic policy gradient theorems for the average reward performance criterion. Using these theorems, we also present an Average Reward Off-Policy Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (ARO-DDPG) Algorithm. We first show asymptotic convergence analysis using the ODE-based method. Subsequently, we provide a finite time analysis of the resulting stochastic approximation scheme with linear function approximator and obtain an $\epsilon$-optimal stationary policy with a sample complexity of $\Omega(\epsilon^{-2.5})$. We compare the average reward performance of our proposed ARO-DDPG algorithm and observe better empirical performance compared to state-of-the-art on-policy average reward actor-critic algorithms over MuJoCo-based environments.
Naman Saxena, Subhojyoti Khastagir, Shishir Kolathaya, Shalabh Bhatnagar
ICML1
2023 A statistical approach for reducing misinformation propagation on twitter social media
Naman Saxena, Adwitiya Sinha, Tanishk Bansal, Ankita Wadhwa
Inf. Process. Manag.1
2017 Implementation and Performance Comparison of a Four-Bit Ripple-Carry Adder Using Different MOS Current Mode Logic Topologies
Naman Saxena, Shruti Dutta, Neeta Pandey
ICCSA (6)1