Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anupama Nandi

dblp:168/8476 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 55% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 15%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Information theory · 65% Mathematical optimization · 20% Computational geometry · 15%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › signal processing
independent component analysis
0.522017
Heavy-Tailed Analogues of the Covariance Matrix for ICA · AAAI 2017
Heavy-Tailed Independent Component Analysis · FOCS 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
differentially private optimization
0.512021
Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
differential privacy
0.512021
Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
excess risk bounds
0.512021
Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
stochastic convex optimization
0.512021
Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
agnostic learning
0.412020
Learning from Mixtures of Private and Public Populations · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.412020
Learning from Mixtures of Private and Public Populations · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.412020
Learning from Mixtures of Private and Public Populations · NeurIPS 2020
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.412020
Learning from Mixtures of Private and Public Populations · NeurIPS 2020
Computational geometry
convex geometry
0.212015
Heavy-Tailed Independent Component Analysis · FOCS 2015
Information theory › probability theory
heavy-tailed distributions
0.212015
Heavy-Tailed Independent Component Analysis · FOCS 2015
Information theory
moment constraints
0.212015
Heavy-Tailed Independent Component Analysis · FOCS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

differential privacy · 0.9PAC learning · 0.9uniform convexity · 0.5noisy stochastic gradient descent · 0.5gaussian mechanism · 0.5heavy-tailed distributions · 0.3covariance matrix estimation · 0.3spherical gaussian distribution · 0.2convex geometry · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization
abstract
Differentially private (DP) stochastic convex optimization (SCO) is a fundamental problem, where the goal is to approximately minimize the population risk with respect to a convex loss function, given a dataset of i.i.d. samples from a distribution, while satisfying differential privacy with respect to the dataset. Most of the existing works in the literature of private convex optimization focus on the Euclidean (i.e., $\ell_2$) setting, where the loss is assumed to be Lipschitz (and possibly smooth) w.r.t. the $\ell_2$ norm over a constraint set with bounded $\ell_2$ diameter. Algorithms based on noisy stochastic gradient descent (SGD) are known to attain the optimal excess risk in this setting. In this work, we conduct a systematic study of DP-SCO for $\ell_p$-setups. For $p=1$, under a standard smoothness assumption, we give a new algorithm with nearly optimal excess risk. This result also extends to general polyhedral norms and feasible sets. For $p\in(1, 2)$, we give two new algorithms, whose central building block is a novel privacy mechanism, which generalizes the Gaussian mechanism. Moreover, we establish a lower bound on the excess risk for this range of $p$, showing a necessary dependence on $\sqrt{d}$, where $d$ is the dimension of the space. Our lower bound implies a sudden transition of the excess risk at $p=1$, where the dependence on $d$ changes from logarithmic to polynomial, resolving an open question in prior work \citep{TTZ15a}. For $p\in (2, \infty)$, noisy SGD attains optimal excess risk in the low-dimensional regime; in particular, this proves the optimality of noisy SGD for $p=\infty$. Our work draws upon concepts from the geometry of normed spaces, such as the notions of regularity, uniform convexity, and uniform smoothness.
Raef Bassily, Cristóbal Guzmán, Anupama Nandi
COLT3
2020 Privately Answering Classification Queries in the Agnostic PAC Model
abstract
We revisit the problem of differentially private release of classification queries. In this problem, the goal is to design an algorithm that can accurately answer a sequence of classification queries based on a private training set while ensuring differential privacy. We formally study this problem in the agnostic PAC model and derive a new upper bound on the private sample complexity. Our results improve over those obtained in a recent work (Bassily et al., 2018) for the agnostic PAC setting. In particular, we give an improved construction that yields a tighter upper bound on the sample complexity. Moreover, unlike (Bassily et al., 2018), our accuracy guarantee does not involve any blow-up in the approximation error associated with the given hypothesis class. Given any hypothesis class with VC-dimension $d$, we show that our construction can privately answer up to $m$ classification queries with average excess error $\alpha$ using a private sample of size $\approx \frac{d}{\alpha^2}\,\max\left(1, \sqrt{m}\,\alpha^{3/2}\right)$. Using recent results on private learning with auxiliary public data, we extend our construction to show that one can privately answer any number of classification queries with average excess error $\alpha$ using a private sample of size $\approx \frac{d}{\alpha^2}\,\max\left(1, \sqrt{d}\,\alpha\right)$. When $\alpha=O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{d}}\right)$, our private sample complexity bound is essentially optimal.
Anupama Nandi, Raef Bassily
ALT1
2020 Learning from Mixtures of Private and Public Populations
abstract
We initiate the study of a new model of supervised learning under privacy constraints. Imagine a medical study where a dataset is sampled from a population of both healthy and unhealthy individuals. Suppose healthy individuals have no privacy concerns (in such case, we call their data ``public'') while the unhealthy individuals desire stringent privacy protection for their data. In this example, the population (data distribution) is a mixture of private (unhealthy) and public (healthy) sub-populations that could be very different. Inspired by the above example, we consider a model in which the population $\cD$ is a mixture of two possibly distinct sub-populations: a private sub-population $\Dprv$ of private and sensitive data, and a public sub-population $\Dpub$ of data with no privacy concerns. Each example drawn from $\cD$ is assumed to contain a privacy-status bit that indicates whether the example is private or public. The goal is to design a learning algorithm that satisfies differential privacy only with respect to the private examples. Prior works in this context assumed a homogeneous population where private and public data arise from the same distribution, and in particular designed solutions which exploit this assumption. We demonstrate how to circumvent this assumption by considering, as a case study, the problem of learning linear classifiers in $R^d$. We show that in the case where the privacy status is correlated with the target label (as in the above example), linear classifiers in $R^d$ can be learned, in the agnostic as well as the realizable setting, with sample complexity which is comparable to that of the classical (non-private) PAC-learning. It is known that this task is impossible if all the data is considered private.
Raef Bassily, Shay Moran, Anupama Nandi
NeurIPS3
2017 Heavy-Tailed Analogues of the Covariance Matrix for ICA
Navin Goyal, Anupama Nandi, Luis Rademacher
AAAI3
2015 Heavy-Tailed Independent Component Analysis
abstract
Independent component analysis (ICA) is the problem of efficiently recovering a matrix A ∈ ℝn×nfrom i.i.d. Observations of X=AS where S ∈ ℝnis a random vector with mutually independent coordinates. This problem has been intensively studied, but all existing efficient algorithms with provable guarantees require that the coordinates Si have finite fourth moments. We consider the heavy-tailed ICA problem where we do not make this assumption, about the second moment. This problem also has received considerable attention in the applied literature. In the present work, we first give a provably efficient algorithm that works under the assumption that for constant γ > 0, each Sihas finite (1+γ)-moment, thus substantially weakening the moment requirement condition for the ICA problem to be solvable. We then give an algorithm that works under the assumption that matrix A has orthogonal columns but requires no moment assumptions. Our techniques draw ideas from convex geometry and exploit standard properties of the multivariate spherical Gaussian distribution in a novel way.
Navin Goyal, Anupama Nandi, Luis Rademacher
FOCS3