Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bernd Kaiser

dblp:168/9518 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Web and mobile security · 50% Systems and software security · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and mobile security › web security
cross-site scripting
0.212015
From Facepalm to Brain Bender: Exploring Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting · CCS 2015
Systems and software security › vulnerability analysis
root cause analysis
0.212015
From Facepalm to Brain Bender: Exploring Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting · CCS 2015
Systems and software security
vulnerability analysis
0.212015
From Facepalm to Brain Bender: Exploring Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting · CCS 2015
Web and mobile security
web application security
0.212015
From Facepalm to Brain Bender: Exploring Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting · CCS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vulnerability replay · 0.2taint analysis · 0.2dynamic analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 From Facepalm to Brain Bender: Exploring Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting
abstract
Although studies have shown that at least one in ten Web pages contains a client-side XSS vulnerability, the prevalent causes for this class of Cross-Site Scripting have not been studied in depth. Therefore, in this paper, we present a large-scale study to gain insight into these causes. To this end, we analyze a set of 1,273 real-world vulnerabilities contained on the Alexa Top 10k domains using a specifically designed architecture, consisting of an infrastructure which allows us to persist and replay vulnerabilities to ensure a sound analysis. In combination with a taint-aware browsing engine, we can therefore collect important execution trace information for all flaws. Based on the observable characteristics of the vulnerable JavaScript, we derive a set of metrics to measure the complexity of each flaw. We subsequently classify all vulnerabilities in our data set accordingly to enable a more systematic analysis. In doing so, we find that although a large portion of all vulnerabilities have a low complexity rating, several incur a significant level of complexity and are repeatedly caused by vulnerable third-party scripts. In addition, we gain insights into other factors related to the existence of client-side XSS flaws, such as missing knowledge of browser-provided APIs, and find that the root causes for Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting range from unaware developers to incompatible first- and third-party code.
Ben Stock, Stephan Pfistner, Bernd Kaiser, Sebastian Lekies, Martin Johns
CCS3