Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Clint Malcolm

dblp:169/3333 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% 3D vision · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric reasoning
0.212015
Solving Geometry Problems: Combining Text and Diagram Interpretation · EMNLP 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
geometry problem solving
0.212015
Solving Geometry Problems: Combining Text and Diagram Interpretation · EMNLP 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

submodular optimization · 0.2semantic parsing · 0.2dependency parsing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Solving Geometry Problems: Combining Text and Diagram Interpretation
abstract
This paper introduces GEOS, the first automated system to solve unaltered SAT geometry questions by combining text understanding and diagram interpretation.We model the problem of understanding geometry questions as submodular optimization, and identify a formal problem description likely to be compatible with both the question text and diagram.GEOS then feeds the description to a geometric solver that attempts to determine the correct answer.In our experiments, GEOS achieves a 49% score on official SAT questions, and a score of 61% on practice questions. 1 Finally, we show that by integrating textual and visual information, GEOS boosts the accuracy of dependency and semantic parsing of the question text.
Minjoon Seo, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ali Farhadi, Oren Etzioni, Clint Malcolm
EMNLP5