Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yizheng Zhu
dblp:169/4023
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 60% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 20% Systems and software security · 12% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 40% Efficient and distributed learning · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
edge differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
privacy-preserving graph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge Proofs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge Proofs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective Perturbation · ICDE 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge Proofs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sensitivity analysis · 1.7objective perturbation · 1.7secure aggregation · 1.5probabilistic integrity check · 1.5hybrid commitment scheme · 1.5byzantine robustness · 1.5skellam mixture mechanism · 1.1secure multiparty computation · 0.6secure multi-party computation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GCON: Differentially Private Graph Convolutional Network via Objective PerturbationabstractGraph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) are a popular machine learning model with a wide range of applications in graph analytics, including healthcare, transportation, and finance. However, a GCN trained without privacy protection measures may memorize private interpersonal relationships in the training data through its model parameters. This poses a substantial risk of compromising privacy through link attacks, potentially leading to violations of privacy regulations such as GDPR. To defend against such attacks, a promising approach is to train the GCN with differential privacy (DP), a rigorous framework that provides strong privacy protection by injecting random noise into the training process. However, training a GCN under DP is a highly challenging task. Existing solutions either perturb the graph topology or inject randomness into the graph convolution operations, or overestimate the amount of noise required, resulting in severe distortions of the network's message aggregation and, thus, poor model utility. Motivated by this, we propose GCON, a novel and effective solution for training GCNs with edge differential privacy. GCON leverages the classic idea of perturbing the objective function to satisfy DP and maintains an unaltered graph convolution process. Our rigorous theoretical analysis offers tight, closed-form bounds on the sensitivity of the graph convolution results and quantifies the impact of an edge modification on the trained model parameters. Extensive experiments using multiple benchmark datasets across diverse settings demonstrate the consistent superiority of GCON over existing solutions, as well as its resilience to link inference attacks. Jianxin Wei 0005, Yizheng Zhu, Xiaokui Xiao, Ergute Bao, Yin Yang 0001, Kuntai Cai, Beng Chin Ooi |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2024 | Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge ProofsabstractFederated Learning (FL) emerges as a viable solution to facilitate data collaboration, enabling multiple clients to collaboratively train a machine learning (ML) model under the supervision of a central server while ensuring the confidentiality of their raw data. However, existing studies have unveiled two main risks: (i) the potential for the server to infer sensitive information from the client's uploaded updates (i.e., model gradients), compromising client input privacy, and (ii) the risk of malicious clients uploading malformed updates to poison the FL model, compromising input integrity. Recent works utilize secure aggregation with zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) to guarantee input privacy and integrity in FL. Nevertheless, they suffer from extremely low efficiency and, thus, are impractical for real deployment. In this paper, we propose a novel and highly efficient approach RiseFL for secure and verifiable data collaboration, ensuring input privacy and integrity simultaneously. Firstly, we devise a probabilistic integrity check method that transforms strict checks into a hypothesis test problem, offering great optimization opportunities. Secondly, we introduce a hybrid commitment scheme to satisfy Byzantine robustness with improved performance. Thirdly, we present an optimized ZKP generation and verification technique that significantly reduces the ZKP cost based on probabilistic integrity checks. Furthermore, we theoretically prove the security guarantee of RiseFL and provide a cost analysis compared to state-of-the-art baselines. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets suggest that our approach is effective and highly efficient in both client computation and communication. For instance, RiseFL is up to 28x, 53x, and 164x faster than baselines ACORN, RoFL, and EIFFeL for the client computation. Yizheng Zhu, Yuncheng Wu, Zhaojing Luo, Beng Chin Ooi, Xiaokui Xiao |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2022 | Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential PrivacyabstractDeep neural networks have strong capabilities of memorizing the underlying training data, which can be a serious privacy concern. An effective solution to this problem is to train models withdifferential privacy(DP), which provides rigorous privacy guarantees by injecting random noise to the gradients. This paper focuses on the scenario where sensitive data are distributed among multiple participants, who jointly train a model throughfederated learning, using bothsecure multiparty computation(MPC) to ensure the confidentiality of each gradient update, and differential privacy to avoid data leakage in the resulting model. A major challenge in this setting is that common mechanisms for enforcing DP in deep learning, which injectreal-valued noise, are fundamentally incompatible with MPC, which exchangesfinite-field integersamong the participants. Consequently, most existing DP mechanisms require rather high noise levels, leading to poor model utility. Motivated by this, we proposeSkellam mixture mechanism(SMM), a novel approach to enforcing DP on models built via federated learning. Compared to existing methods, SMM eliminates the assumption that the input gradients must be integer-valued, and, thus, reduces the amount of noise injected to preserve DP. The theoretical analysis of SMM is highly non-trivial, especially considering (i) the complicated math of DP deep learning in general and (ii) the fact that the mixture of two Skellam distributions is rather complex. Extensive experiments on various practical settings demonstrate that SMM consistently and significantly outperforms existing solutions in terms of the utility of the resulting model. Ergute Bao, Yizheng Zhu, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin Yang 0001, Beng Chin Ooi, Benjamin Hong Meng Tan, Khin Mi Mi Aung |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2015 | Realizing an AD+ model as a derived model of a premouse
Yizheng Zhu |
Ann. Pure Appl. Log. | 1 |