Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Malte Lücken
dblp:169/5291 · also Malte D. Lücken, Malte Luecken
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7464-7921ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell transcriptomics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A benchmark for prediction of transcriptomic responses to chemical perturbations across cell types · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A benchmark for prediction of transcriptomic responses to chemical perturbations across cell types · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
molecular network analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | CommWalker: correctly evaluating modules in molecular networks in light of annotation bias · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction
protein-protein interaction network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | CommWalker: correctly evaluating modules in molecular networks in light of annotation bias · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random walk · 0.3community detection · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A benchmark for prediction of transcriptomic responses to chemical perturbations across cell typesabstractSingle-cell transcriptomics has revolutionized our understanding of cellular heterogeneity and drug perturbation effects. However, its high cost and the vast chemical space of potential drugs present barriers to experimentally characterizing the effect of chemical perturbations in all the myriad cell types of the human body. To overcome these limitations, several groups have proposed using machine learning methods to directly predict the effect of chemical perturbations either across cell contexts or chemical space. However, advances in this field have been hindered by a lack of well-designed evaluation datasets and benchmarks. To drive innovation in perturbation modeling, the Open Problems Perturbation Prediction (OP3) benchmark introduces a framework for predicting the effects of small molecule perturbations on cell type-specific gene expression. OP3 leverages the Open Problems in Single-cell Analysis benchmarking infrastructure and is enabled by a new single-cell perturbation dataset, encompassing 146 compounds tested on human blood cells. The benchmark includes diverse data representations, evaluation metrics, and winning methods from our "Single-cell perturbation prediction: generalizing experimental interventions to unseen contexts" competition at NeurIPS 2023. We envision that the OP3 benchmark and competition will drive innovation in single-cell perturbation prediction by improving the accessibility, visibility, and feasibility of this challenge, thereby promoting the impact of machine learning in drug discovery. Artur Szalata, Andrew Benz, Robrecht Cannoodt, Mauricio Cortes, Jason Fong, Sunil Kuppasani, Richard Lieberman, Javier Mas-Rosario, Rico Meinl, Jalil Nourisa, Jared Tumiel, Tin M. Tunjic, Mengbo Wang 0001, Noah Weber, Benedict Anchang, Fabian J. Theis, Malte Lücken, Daniel Burkhardt |
NeurIPS | 19 |
| 2018 | CommWalker: correctly evaluating modules in molecular networks in light of annotation biasabstractMotivation: Detecting novel functional modules in molecular networks is an important step in biological research. In the absence of gold standard functional modules, functional annotations are often used to verify whether detected modules/communities have biological meaning. However, as we show, the uneven distribution of functional annotations means that such evaluation methods favor communities of well-studied proteins. Results: We propose a novel framework for the evaluation of communities as functional modules. Our proposed framework, CommWalker, takes communities as inputs and evaluates them in their local network environment by performing short random walks. We test CommWalker's ability to overcome annotation bias using input communities from four community detection methods on two protein interaction networks. We find that modules accepted by CommWalker are similarly co-expressed as those accepted by current methods. Crucially, CommWalker performs well not only in well-annotated regions, but also in regions otherwise obscured by poor annotation. CommWalker community prioritization both faithfully captures well-validated communities and identifies functional modules that may correspond to more novel biology. Availability and implementation: The CommWalker algorithm is freely available at opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/resources or as a docker image on the Docker Hub at hub.docker.com/r/lueckenmd/commwalker/. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Malte Lücken, M. J. T. Page, A. J. Crosby, S. Mason, Gesine Reinert, Charlotte M. Deane |
Bioinform. | 1 |