Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Mudrak

dblp:169/7036 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 70% Recommender systems · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
recommender system evaluation
0.512021
On Estimating Recommendation Evaluation Metrics under Sampling · AAAI 2021
Information retrieval › evaluation › evaluation methodology
sampling-based evaluation
0.512021
On Estimating Recommendation Evaluation Metrics under Sampling · AAAI 2021
Information retrieval › evaluation › effectiveness metrics
top-k evaluation metrics
0.512021
On Estimating Recommendation Evaluation Metrics under Sampling · AAAI 2021
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.112021
On Estimating Recommendation Evaluation Metrics under Sampling · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted maximum likelihood estimation · 0.5maximum entropy · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 On Estimating Recommendation Evaluation Metrics under Sampling
abstract
Since the recent studies (KDD'20) done by Krichene and Rendle on the sampling based top-k evaluation metric for recommendation, there have been a lot of debate on the validity of using sampling for evaluating recommendation algorithms. Though their work and the recent work done by Li et. al. (KDD'20) have proposed some basic approach for mapping the sampling based metrics to their counter-part in the global evaluation which uses the entire dataset, there is still lack of understanding how sampling should be used for recommendation evaluation, and the proposed approaches either are rather ad-hoc or can only work on simple metrics, like Recall/Hit-Ratio. In this paper, we introduce some principled approach to derive the estimators of top-k metric based on sampling. Our approaches utilize the weighted MLE and maximal entropy approach to recover the global rank distribution and then utilize that for estimation. The experimental results shows significant advantages of using our approaches for evaluating recommendation algorithms based on top-k metrics.
Ruoming Jin, Dong Li 0047, Benjamin Mudrak
AAAI3