Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patrick Owen
dblp:169/8812
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network measurement and analytics · 77% Network management and operations · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network measurement and analytics › active measurement
active probing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Timeouts: Beware Surprisingly High Delay · Internet Measurement Conference 2015 |
Network management and operations › fault management
outage detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Timeouts: Beware Surprisingly High Delay · Internet Measurement Conference 2015 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Timeouts: Beware Surprisingly High DelayabstractActive probing techniques, such as ping, have been used to detect outages. When a previously responsive end host fails to respond to a probe, studies sometimes attempt to confirm the outage by retrying the ping or attempt to identify the location of the outage by using other tools such as traceroute. The latent problem, however, is, how long should one wait for a response to the ping? Too short a timeout risks confusing congestion or other delay with an outage. Too long a timeout may slow the process and prevent observing and diagnosing short-duration events, depending on the experiment's design. Ramakrishna Padmanabhan, Patrick Owen, Aaron Schulman, Neil Spring |
Internet Measurement Conference | 2 |