Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Min Jae Song

dblp:169/9994 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3033-906XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Learning theory · 42% Generative modeling · 21% Deep learning architectures and training · 10%
Network and information security
3 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational complexity · 64% Algorithms and data structures · 36%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography
1.832024
Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimation · NeurIPS 2024
Continuous LWE · STOC 2021
On the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Single Periodic Neurons · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model
0.812024
Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimation · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score estimation
0.812024
Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimation · NeurIPS 2024
Computational complexity
computational hardness
0.812024
Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimation · NeurIPS 2024
Computational complexity › cryptographic complexity
cryptographic hardness
0.812024
Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimation · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory
0.722021
On the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Single Periodic Neurons · NeurIPS 2021
Continuous LWE · STOC 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient flow
0.612022
Learning single-index models with shallow neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.612022
Learning single-index models with shallow neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
shallow neural networks
0.612022
Learning single-index models with shallow neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › semiparametric inference
single-index model
0.612022
Learning single-index models with shallow neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.612022
Learning single-index models with shallow neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.612022
Lattice-Based Methods Surpass Sum-of-Squares in Clustering · COLT 2022
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › stochastic clustering
gaussian mixture clustering
0.612022
Lattice-Based Methods Surpass Sum-of-Squares in Clustering · COLT 2022
Computational complexity
statistical-computational gaps
0.612022
Lattice-Based Methods Surpass Sum-of-Squares in Clustering · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
cryptographic hardness of learning
0.512021
On the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Single Periodic Neurons · NeurIPS 2021
Robotics › Robot manipulation
motion retargeting
0.512021
Self-Supervised Motion Retargeting with Safety Guarantee · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.512021
Self-Supervised Motion Retargeting with Safety Guarantee · ICRA 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic assumptions
hardness of lattice problems
0.512021
Continuous LWE · STOC 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
learning with errors
0.512021
Continuous LWE · STOC 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
0.512021
Continuous LWE · STOC 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning › mixture learning
gaussian mixture learning
0.112021
Continuous LWE · STOC 2021
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
humanoid motion generation
0.112021
Self-Supervised Motion Retargeting with Safety Guarantee · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
humanoid robot
0.112021
Self-Supervised Motion Retargeting with Safety Guarantee · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reduction · 2.3lattice-based hardness assumptions · 2.3reduction from learning to lattice problems · 1.0quantum reduction · 1.0LLL lattice basis reduction · 1.0sum-of-squares hierarchy · 0.6random bias initialization · 0.6low-degree polynomial method · 0.6lattice basis reduction · 0.6gradient flow · 0.6statistical query model · 0.5shared latent embedding · 0.5self-supervised learning · 0.5nonparametric regression · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Unforgeable Watermarks for Language Models via Robust Signatures
Huijia Lin, Kameron Shahabi, Min Jae Song
CRYPTO (7)3
2024 Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimation
abstract
We show that L2-accurate score estimation, in the absence of strong assumptions on the data distribution, is computationally hard even when sample complexity is polynomial in the relevant problem parameters. Our reduction builds on the result of Chen et al. (ICLR 2023), who showed that the problem of generating samples from an unknown data distribution reduces to L2-accurate score estimation. Our hard-to-estimate distributions are the "Gaussian pancakes" distributions, originally due to Diakonikolas et al. (FOCS 2017), which have been shown to be computationally indistinguishable from the standard Gaussian under widely believed hardness assumptions from lattice-based cryptography (Bruna et al., STOC 2021; Gupte et al., FOCS 2022).
Min Jae Song
NeurIPS1
2022 Lattice-Based Methods Surpass Sum-of-Squares in Clustering
abstract
Clustering is a fundamental primitive in unsupervised learning which gives rise to a rich class of computationally-challenging inference tasks. In this work, we focus on the canonical task of clustering d-dimensional Gaussian mixtures with unknown (and possibly degenerate) covariance. Recent works (Ghosh et al. ’20; Mao, Wein ’21; Davis, Diaz, Wang ’21) have established lower bounds against the class of low-degree polynomial methods and the sum-of-squares (SoS) hierarchy for recovering certain hidden structures planted in Gaussian clustering instances. Prior work on many similar inference tasks portends that such lower bounds strongly suggest the presence of an inherent statistical-to-computational gap for clustering, that is, a parameter regime where the clustering task is statistically possible but no polynomial-time algorithm succeeds. One special case of the clustering task we consider is equivalent to the problem of finding a planted hypercube vector in an otherwise random subspace. We show that, perhaps surprisingly, this particular clustering model does not exhibit a statistical-to-computational gap, even though the aforementioned low-degree and SoS lower bounds continue to apply in this case. To achieve this, we give a polynomial-time algorithm based on the Lenstra–Lenstra–Lovasz lattice basis reduction method which achieves the statistically-optimal sample complexity of d+1 samples. This result extends the class of problems whose conjectured statistical-to-computational gaps can be "closed" by "brittle" polynomial-time algorithms, highlighting the crucial but subtle role of noise in the onset of statistical-to-computational gaps.
Ilias Zadik, Min Jae Song, Alexander S. Wein, Joan Bruna
COLT2
2022 Learning single-index models with shallow neural networks
abstract
Single-index models are a class of functions given by an unknown univariate ``link'' function applied to an unknown one-dimensional projection of the input. These models are particularly relevant in high dimension, when the data might present low-dimensional structure that learning algorithms should adapt to. While several statistical aspects of this model, such as the sample complexity of recovering the relevant (one-dimensional) subspace, are well-understood, they rely on tailored algorithms that exploit the specific structure of the target function. In this work, we introduce a natural class of shallow neural networks and study its ability to learn single-index models via gradient flow. More precisely, we consider shallow networks in which biases of the neurons are frozen at random initialization. We show that the corresponding optimization landscape is benign, which in turn leads to generalization guarantees that match the near-optimal sample complexity of dedicated semi-parametric methods.
Alberto Bietti, Joan Bruna, Clayton Sanford, Min Jae Song
NeurIPS4
2021 Self-Supervised Motion Retargeting with Safety Guarantee
abstract
In this paper, we present self-supervised shared latent embedding (S3LE), a data-driven motion retargeting method that enables the generation of natural motions in humanoid robots from motion capture data or RGB videos. While it requires paired data consisting of human poses and their corresponding robot configurations, it significantly alleviates the necessity of time-consuming data-collection via novel paired data generating processes. Our self-supervised learning procedure consists of two steps: automatically generating paired data to bootstrap the motion retargeting, and learning a projection-invariant mapping to handle the different expressivity of humans and humanoid robots. Furthermore, our method guarantees that the generated robot pose is collision-free and satisfies position limits by utilizing nonparametric regression in the shared latent space. We demonstrate that our method can generate expressive robotic motions from both the CMU motion capture database and YouTube videos.
Min Jae Song, Hyemin Ahn 0001, Joohyung Kim
ICRA2
2021 On the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Single Periodic Neurons
abstract
We show a simple reduction which demonstrates the cryptographic hardness of learning a single periodic neuron over isotropic Gaussian distributions in the presence of noise. More precisely, our reduction shows that any polynomial-time algorithm (not necessarily gradient-based) for learning such functions under small noise implies a polynomial-time quantum algorithm for solving worst-case lattice problems, whose hardness form the foundation of lattice-based cryptography. Our core hard family of functions, which are well-approximated by one-layer neural networks, take the general form of a univariate periodic function applied to an affine projection of the data. These functions have appeared in previous seminal works which demonstrate their hardness against gradient-based (Shamir'18), and Statistical Query (SQ) algorithms (Song et al.'17). We show that if (polynomially) small noise is added to the labels, the intractability of learning these functions applies to all polynomial-time algorithms, beyond gradient-based and SQ algorithms, under the aforementioned cryptographic assumptions. Moreover, we demonstrate the necessity of noise in the hardness result by designing a polynomial-time algorithm for learning certain families of such functions under exponentially small adversarial noise. Our proposed algorithm is not a gradient-based or an SQ algorithm, but is rather based on the celebrated Lenstra-Lenstra-Lov\'asz (LLL) lattice basis reduction algorithm. Furthermore, in the absence of noise, this algorithm can be directly applied to solve CLWE detection (Bruna et al.'21) and phase retrieval with an optimal sample complexity of $d+1$ samples. In the former case, this improves upon the quadratic-in-$d$ sample complexity required in (Bruna et al.'21).
Min Jae Song, Ilias Zadik, Joan Bruna
NeurIPS1
2021 Continuous LWE
abstract
We introduce a continuous analogue of the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem, which we name CLWE. We give a polynomial-time quantum reduction from worst-case lattice problems to CLWE, showing that CLWE enjoys similar hardness guarantees to those of LWE. Alternatively, our result can also be seen as opening new avenues of (quantum) attacks on lattice problems. Our work resolves an open problem regarding the computational complexity of learning mixtures of Gaussians without separability assumptions (Diakonikolas 2016, Moitra 2018). As an additional motivation, (a slight variant of) CLWE was considered in the context of robust machine learning (Diakonikolas et al.~FOCS 2017), where hardness in the statistical query (SQ) model was shown; our work addresses the open question regarding its computational hardness (Bubeck et al.~ICML 2019).
Joan Bruna, Oded Regev 0001, Min Jae Song, Yi Tang 0012
STOC3