EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yonghoon Lee
dblp:17/10583
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 54% Learning theory · 31% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Synthetic-powered predictive inference · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Synthetic-powered predictive inference · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › confidence set construction
confidence intervals |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distribution-free inference for regression: discrete, continuous, and in between · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
distribution-free inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distribution-free inference for regression: discrete, continuous, and in between · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distribution-free inference for regression: discrete, continuous, and in between · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score transporter · 0.9empirical quantile mapping · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9cross-validation · 0.5conformal prediction · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Synthetic-powered predictive inferenceabstractConformal prediction is a framework for predictive inference with a distribution-free, finite-sample guarantee. However, it tends to provide uninformative prediction sets when calibration data are scarce. This paper introduces Synthetic-powered predictive inference (SPI), a novel framework that incorporates synthetic data---e.g., from a generative model---to improve sample efficiency. At the core of our method is a score transporter: an empirical quantile mapping that aligns nonconformity scores from trusted, real data with those from synthetic data. By carefully integrating the score transporter into the calibration process, SPI provably achieves finite-sample coverage guarantees without making any assumptions about the real and synthetic data distributions. When the score distributions are well aligned, SPI yields substantially tighter and more informative prediction sets than standard conformal prediction. Experiments on image classification---augmenting data with synthetic diffusion-model generated images---and on tabular regression demonstrate notable improvements in predictive efficiency in data-scarce settings. Meshi Bashari, Roy Maor Lotan, Yonghoon Lee, Edgar Dobriban, Yaniv Romano |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Distribution-free inference for regression: discrete, continuous, and in betweenabstractIn data analysis problems where we are not able to rely on distributional assumptions, what types of inference guarantees can still be obtained? Many popular methods, such as holdout methods, cross-validation methods, and conformal prediction, are able to provide distribution-free guarantees for predictive inference, but the problem of providing inference for the underlying regression function (for example, inference on the conditional mean $\mathbb{E}[Y|X]$) is more challenging. In the setting where the features $X$ are continuously distributed, recent work has established that any confidence interval for $\mathbb{E}[Y|X]$ must have non-vanishing width, even as sample size tends to infinity. At the other extreme, if $X$ takes only a small number of possible values, then inference on $\mathbb{E}[Y|X]$ is trivial to achieve. In this work, we study the problem in settings in between these two extremes. We find that there are several distinct regimes in between the finite setting and the continuous setting, where vanishing-width confidence intervals are achievable if and only if the effective support size of the distribution of $X$ is smaller than the square of the sample size. Yonghoon Lee, Rina Foygel Barber |
NeurIPS | 1 |