Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew J. McPherson
dblp:17/11411
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Concurrent programming · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent programming › memory models
fence insertion |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Fence Placement for Legacy Data-Race-Free Programs via Synchronization Read Detection · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 Fence placement for legacy data-race-free programs via synchronization read detection · PPoPP 2015 |
Concurrent programming
memory models |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Fence Placement for Legacy Data-Race-Free Programs via Synchronization Read Detection · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 Fence placement for legacy data-race-free programs via synchronization read detection · PPoPP 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fence placement · 0.2LLVM · 0.2static analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Fence Placement for Legacy Data-Race-Free Programs via Synchronization Read DetectionabstractShared-memory programmers traditionally assumed Sequential Consistency (SC), but modern systems have relaxed memory consistency. Here, the trend in languages is toward Data-Race-Free (DRF) models, where, assuming annotated synchronizations and the program being well-synchronized by those synchronizations, the hardware and compiler guarantee SC. However, legacy programs lack annotations, so even well-synchronized (legacy DRF) programs aren’t recognized. For legacy DRF programs, we can significantly prune the set of memory orderings determined by automated fence placement by automatically identifying synchronization reads. We prove our rules for identifying them conservatively, implement them within LLVM, and observe a 30% average performance improvement over previous techniques. Andrew J. McPherson, Vijay Nagarajan, Susmit Sarkar, Marcelo Cintra |
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. | 1 |
| 2015 | Fence placement for legacy data-race-free programs via synchronization read detectionabstractFence placement is required to ensure legacy parallel programs operate correctly on relaxed architectures. The challenge is to place as few fences as possible without compromising correctness. By identifying necessary conditions for a read to be an acquire we improve upon the state of the art for legacy DRF programs by up to 2.64x. Andrew J. McPherson, Vijay Nagarajan, Susmit Sarkar, Marcelo Cintra |
PPoPP | 1 |