Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jennifer L. Beckmann
dblp:17/1291 · also Jennifer L. Beckham
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Database system architecture and tuning · 50% Indexing and storage engines · 29% Query processing and optimization · 21% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Database system architecture and tuning
self-managing database systems |
0.1 | 2 | 2009 | Declarative Database Management in SQLServer · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 The case for a wide-table approach to manage sparse relational data sets · SIGMOD Conference 2007 |
Indexing and storage engines › storage management
sparse data storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Extending RDBMSs To Support Sparse Datasets Using An Interpreted Attribute Storage Format · ICDE 2006 |
Database system architecture and tuning
database administration |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Declarative Database Management in SQLServer · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
schema design · 0.1vertical schema · 0.1interpreted fields · 0.1horizontal schema · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Declarative Database Management in SQLServerabstractThis paper describes the principles and practice of Declarative Management --- a new approach to the management of database systems. The standard approach to database systems management involves a brittle coupling of interactive operations and procedural scripts. Such ad hoc approach results in incorrect administration, which leads to increased management costs. In the Declarative Management paradigm, a user specifies "what" the desired state is, and the system figures out "how" to get there and stay there. Declarative Management represents a fundamental step towards the goal of a self-managing database system. It also has the potential to significantly lower both administrative error and cost. An initial implementation of Declarative Management has been released with the Microsoft SQL Server 2008 database product, and the paper covers the implementation design as well. Hongfei Guo, Dan Jones, Jennifer L. Beckmann, Praveen Seshadri |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2007 | The case for a wide-table approach to manage sparse relational data setsabstractA “sparse ” data set typically has hundreds or even thousands of attributes, but most objects have non-null values for only a small number of these attributes. A popular view about sparse data is that it arises merely as the result of poor schema design. In this paper, we argue that rather than being the result of inept schema design, storing a sparse data set in a single table is the right way to proceed. However, for this to be the case, RDBMSs must provide sparse data management facilities that go beyond the previously studied requirement of storing such data sets efficiently. In particular, an RDBMS must 1) enable users to effectively build ad hoc queries over a very large number of attributes, and 2) support efficient evaluation of these queries over a wide, sparse table. We propose techniques that provide these capabilities, and argue that the single-table approach is a necessary component of selfmanaging database systems because it frees users from a tedious and potentially ineffective schema-design phase when managing sparse data sets. Eric Chu, Jennifer L. Beckmann, Jeffrey F. Naughton |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2006 | Extending RDBMSs To Support Sparse Datasets Using An Interpreted Attribute Storage Formatabstract"Sparse" data, in which relations have many attributes that are null for most tuples, presents a challenge for relational database management systems. If one uses the normal "horizontal" schema to store such data sets in any of the three leading commercial RDBMS, the result is tables that occupy vast amounts of storage, most of which is devoted to nulls. If one attempts to avoid this storage blowup by using a "vertical" schema, the storage utilization is indeed better, but query performance is orders of magnitude slower for certain classes of queries. In this paper, we argue that the proper way to handle sparse data is not to use a vertical schema, but rather to extend the RDBMS tuple storage format to allow the representation of sparse attributes as interpreted fields. The addition of interpreted storage allows for efficient and transparent querying of sparse data, uniform access to all attributes, and schema scalability. We show, through an implementation in PostgreSQL, that the interpreted storage approach dominates in query efficiency and ease-of-use over the current horizontal storage and vertical schema approaches over a wide range of queries and sparse data sets. Jennifer L. Beckmann, Alan Halverson, Rajasekar Krishnamurthy, Jeffrey F. Naughton |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2001 | Towards SMIL as a foundation for multimodal, multimedia applicationsabstractRich and interactive multimedia applications, where audio, video, graphics and text are precisely synchronized under timing constraints are becoming ubiquitous. Multimodal applications further extend the concept of user interaction combining different modalities, like speech recognition, speech synthesis and gestures. However, authoring dialog-capable multimodal, multimedia services is a very difficult task. Fortunately, the W3C has sponsored the development of SMIL, an elegant notation for multimedia applications, which has been embraced by both Microsoft and RealNetworks. In this paper, we argue that SMIL is an ideal substrate for extending multimedia applications with multimodal facilities. SMIL as it stands is not a general notation for controlling media and input mode resources. We show that all what is needed are few natural extensions to SMIL along with the addition of a simple reactive programming language that we call ReX. Our language is designed to be maximally compatible with existing W3C recommendations through a generic event system based on DOM and an expression language based on XPATH. It is also designed to be simple so that the fundamental notion of seeking time (e.g. going backwards and forwards in presentations) is preserved. Jennifer L. Beckmann, Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio, Nils Klarlund |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |