Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Navid Serrano

dblp:17/2022 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 54% Legged, aerial and field robots · 40% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 6%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
traversability estimation
0.112009
A Multisensor Decision Fusion System for Terrain Safety Assessment · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › space robotics
planetary landing
0.112007
Landing Site Selection using Fuzzy Rule-Based Reasoning · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
space robotics
0.112007
Landing Site Selection using Fuzzy Rule-Based Reasoning · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.012009
A Multisensor Decision Fusion System for Terrain Safety Assessment · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning
fuzzy reasoning
0.012007
Landing Site Selection using Fuzzy Rule-Based Reasoning · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzy set theory · 0.1dempster-shafer belief theory · 0.1bayesian probability theory · 0.1sensor fusion · 0.1fuzzy rule-based reasoning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 A Multisensor Decision Fusion System for Terrain Safety Assessment
abstract
This paper describes an onboard automated hybrid reasoning system for terrain safety assessment using multiple heterogeneous sensors onboard a spacecraft. An innovative feature of this system is integration of multiple sensing modalities and different reasoning engines into a unified approach. Three different frameworks for representation of data uncertainty are considered: fuzzy set theory, Bayesian probability theory, and Dempster-Shafer belief theory. The hybrid reasoning system is composed of three subsystems, namely, multisensor fusion, multidecision fusion, and tier-based fusion selection, where each tier represents a range of spacecraft altitudes. Simulation results are presented to illustrate the multisensor decision fusion methodology described in this paper. The developed capabilities will enable future spacecraft to land safely in more challenging planetary regions with scientifically interesting terrain features.
Homayoun Seraji, Navid Serrano
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2007 Landing Site Selection using Fuzzy Rule-Based Reasoning
abstract
In this paper, multiple on-board sensors are used to assess the terrain safety in real-time during spacecraft descent. A linguistic, fuzzy rule-based reasoning engine is used to determine terrain safety from sensor measurements and, together with information about required fuel consumption and site science return, provide a figure-of-merit for all possible landing sites. Additional fuzzy rule-sets are used to address spatial and temporal dependence in the reasoning process in order to arrive at a final score for each potential landing site. This landing score is used to retarget the spacecraft if the original landing site is found to be hazardous. Simulation studies are presented for illustration.
Navid Serrano, Homayoun Seraji
ICRA1
2006 A Bayesian Framework for Landing Site Selection during Autonomous Spacecraft Descent
abstract
The success of a landed space exploration mission depends largely on the final landing site. Factors influencing site selection include safety, fuel-consumption, and scientific return. This paper addresses the problem of selecting the best available landing site based on these factors in real-time during autonomous spacecraft descent onto a planetary surface. The problem is modeled probabilistically using Bayesian networks (BNs). BNs provide a means of representing the causal relationships between variables that impact the quality of a landing site. The final landing site is determined via probabilistic reasoning based on terrain safety derived from on-board sensors, available fuel based on spacecraft descent dynamics, and regions of interest defined by mission scientists
Navid Serrano
IROS1
2004 Improved scene classification using efficient low-level features and semantic cues
Navid Serrano, Andreas E. Savakis, Jiebo Luo 0001
Pattern Recognit.1