Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David P. LaPotin
dblp:17/2060
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 7 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
error diagnosis |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Error Diagnosis for Transistor-Level Verification · DAC 1994 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Error Diagnosis for Transistor-Level Verification · DAC 1994 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification › circuit-level verification
transistor-level verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Error Diagnosis for Transistor-Level Verification · DAC 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
backward propagation of mismatched patterns · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Design methodology for a 1.0 GHz microprocessorabstractThis paper describes the design methodology used to build an experimental 1.0 GigaHertz PowerPC integer microprocessor at IBM's Austin Research Laboratory. The high frequency requirements dictated the chip composition to be almost entirely custom macros using dynamic circuit techniques. The methodology presented will cover design and verification tools as well as circuit constraints and microarchitecture philosophy. The microarchitecture, circuits and tools were defined by the high frequency requirements of the processor as well as the aggressive design schedule and size of the design team. Stephen D. Posluszny, Naoaki Aoki, David W. Boerstler, Jeffrey L. Burns, Sang H. Dhong, Uttam Ghoshal, H. Peter Hofstee, David P. LaPotin, Kyung Tek Lee, David Meltzer, Hung C. Ngo, Kevin J. Nowka, Joel Silberman, Osamu Takahashi, Ivan Vo |
ICCD | 8 |
| 1998 | Accurate area and delay estimation from RTL descriptionsabstractIn this paper, we present a method for efficiently obtaining area and delay estimates from RTL descriptions of a logic design. The estimates are obtained through fast compiler-type optimizations on the RTL descriptions followed by application of best-fit polynomial area and delay models on the resulting technology-independent representation. The estimation techniques were incorporated into a tool called QUEST. QUEST was used by designers of a large commercial CPU to obtain quick feedback on the area and delay impart of behavioral modifications, resulting In significant savings in design schedule. Arvind Srinivasan 0004, Gary D. Huber, David P. LaPotin |
IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. | 3 |
| 1997 | Delay bounded buffered tree construction for timing driven floorplanningabstractAs devices and lines shrink into the deep submicron range, the propagation delay of signals can be effectively improved by repowering the signals using intermediate buffers placed within the routing trees. Almost no existing timing driven floorplanning and placement approaches consider the option of buffer insertion. As such, they may exclude solutions, particularly early in the design process, with smaller overall area and better routability. In this paper, we propose a new methodology in which buffered trees are used to estimate wire delay during floorplanning. Instead of treating delay as one of the objectives, as done by the majority of previous work, we formulate the problem in terms of delay bounded buffered trees (DBB-tree) and propose an efficient algorithm to construct a DBB spanning tree for use during floorplanning. Experimental results show that the algorithm is very effective. Using buffer insertion at the floorplanning stage yields significantly better solutions in terms of both chip area and total wire length. Maggie Zhiwei Kang, Wayne Wei-Ming Dai, Tom Dillinger, David P. LaPotin |
ICCAD | 4 |
| 1997 | Physical design challenges for performanceabstractNo abstract available. David P. LaPotin, Uttam Ghoshal, Eli Chiprout, Sani R. Nassif |
ISPD | 1 |
| 1994 | Error Diagnosis for Transistor-Level VerificationabstractThis paper describes a diagnosis technique for locating design errors in circuit implementations which do not match their functional speci cation.The method eciently propagates mismatched p atterns from erroneous outputs backward into the network and calculates circuit regions which most likely contain the error(s).In contrast to previous approaches, the described t e chnique does not depend on a xed set of error models.Therefore, it is more general and especially suitable for transistor-level circuits, which have a broader variety of possible design errors than gate-level implementations.Furthermore, the proposed method is also applicable for incomplete sets of mismatched p atterns and hence c an be used not only as a debugging aid for formal veri cation techniques but also for simulationbased approaches.Experiments with industrial CMOS circuits show that for most design errors the identi ed problem region is less than 3% of the overall circuit. Andreas Kuehlmann, David Ihsin Cheng, Arvind Srinivasan 0004, David P. LaPotin |
DAC | 4 |
| 1989 | Early matching of system requirements and package capabilitiesabstractThe benefits of early package wirability analysis to the large system design process are discussed. The authors show that preliminary design exploration coupled with appropriate prediction tools provide designers with a powerful early evaluation methodology. PEPPER, an interactive package design and performance prediction tool, is described, which allows designers to quickly analyze system and technology tradeoffs very early in the design cycle. PEPPER has been evaluated on a number of large system components and the results have been very encouraging in terms of accurately predicting package wiring characteristics as well as providing insight into package design.> David P. LaPotin |
ICCAD | 1 |
| 1984 | DIF: A framework for VLSI multi-level representation
David P. LaPotin, Sani R. Nassif, Jayanth V. Rajan, Michael L. Bushnell, John A. Nestor |
Integr. | 1 |