Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianyi Zhang 0007

dblp:17/322-7 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Graph learning · 19% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% Language models and text generation · 14%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.512021
Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.412020
Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation
0.412020
BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation
0.412020
Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.412020
Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network
0.412019
Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
linear model
0.412019
Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks · ICML 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
model order reduction
0.412019
Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph convolution
simplified graph convolution
0.412019
Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.112021
Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text representation
0.112020
BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT · ICLR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

few-sample learning · 0.5BERT fine-tuning · 0.5threshold sample class · 0.4embedding similarity · 0.4area under the margin statistic · 0.4BERT · 0.4low-pass filter · 0.4graph convolution · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuning
Tianyi Zhang 0007, Felix Wu, Arzoo Katiyar, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Yoav Artzi
ICLR1
2020 BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT
Tianyi Zhang 0007, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Yoav Artzi
ICLR1
2020 Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking
abstract
Not all data in a typical training set help with generalization; some samples can be overly ambiguous or outrightly mislabeled. This paper introduces a new method to identify such samples and mitigate their impact when training neural networks. At the heart of our algorithm is the Area Under the Margin (AUM) statistic, which exploits differences in the training dynamics of clean and mislabeled samples. A simple procedure - adding an extra class populated with purposefully mislabeled threshold samples - learns a AUM upper bound that isolates mislabeled data. This approach consistently improves upon prior work on synthetic and real-world datasets. On the WebVision50 classification task our method removes 17% of training data, yielding a 1.6% (absolute) improvement in test error. On CIFAR100 removing 13% of the data leads to a 1.2% drop in error.
Geoff Pleiss, Tianyi Zhang 0007, Ethan R. Elenberg, Kilian Q. Weinberger
NeurIPS2
2019 Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks
abstract
Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) and their variants have experienced significant attention and have become the de facto methods for learning graph representations. GCNs derive inspiration primarily from recent deep learning approaches, and as a result, may inherit unnecessary complexity and redundant computation. In this paper, we reduce this excess complexity through successively removing nonlinearities and collapsing weight matrices between consecutive layers. We theoretically analyze the resulting linear model and show that it corresponds to a fixed low-pass filter followed by a linear classifier. Notably, our experimental evaluation demonstrates that these simplifications do not negatively impact accuracy in many downstream applications. Moreover, the resulting model scales to larger datasets, is naturally interpretable, and yields up to two orders of magnitude speedup over FastGCN.
Felix Wu, Amauri H. Souza, Tianyi Zhang 0007, Christopher Fifty, Kilian Q. Weinberger
ICML3