Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert Jedicke

dblp:17/3336 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 54% Computational geometry · 46%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 50% Spatial and temporal data management · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
pattern mining
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial analysis
spatial pattern matching
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Computational geometry › spatial data structures
kd-tree
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
search trees
0.112005
A multiple tree algorithm for the efficient association of asteroid observations · KDD 2005
Computational geometry
spatial data structures
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Computational science and engineering
astronomy
0.012005
A multiple tree algorithm for the efficient association of asteroid observations · KDD 2005
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.012005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiple tree algorithm · 0.2combinatorial search · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 A multiple tree algorithm for the efficient association of asteroid observations
abstract
In this paper we examine the problem of efficiently finding sets of observations that conform to a given underlying motion model. While this problem is often phrased as a tracking problem, where it is called track initiation, it is useful in a variety of tasks where we want to find correspondences or patterns in spatial-temporal data. Unfortunately, this problem often suffers from a combinatorial explosion in the number of potential sets that must be evaluated. We consider the problem with respect to large-scale asteroid observation data, where the goal is to find associations among the observations that correspond to the same underlying asteroid. In this domain, it is vital that we can efficiently extract the underlying associations. We introduce a new methodology for track initiation that exhaustively considers all possible linkages. We then introduce an exact tree-based algorithm for tractably finding all compatible sets of points. Further, we extend this approach to use multiple trees, exploiting structure from several time steps at once. We compare this approach to a standard sequential approach and show how the use of multiple trees can provide a significant benefit.
Jeremy Kubica, Andrew W. Moore 0001, Andrew J. Connolly, Robert Jedicke
KDD4
2005 Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery
abstract
In this paper we consider the problem of finding sets of points that conform to a given underlying model from within a dense, noisy set of observations. This problem is motivated by the task of efficiently linking faint asteroid detections, but is applicable to a range of spatial queries. We survey current tree-based approaches, showing a trade-off exists between single tree and multiple tree algorithms. To this end, we present a new type of multiple tree algorithm that uses a variable number of trees to exploit the advantages of both approaches. We empirically show that this algorithm performs well using both simulated and astronomical data.
Jeremy Kubica, Joseph Masiero, Andrew W. Moore 0001, Robert Jedicke, Andrew J. Connolly
NIPS4