Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Riccardo Mattolini

dblp:17/3916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 87% Automated reasoning and model checking · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time system design
real-time system specification
0.012001
An Interval Logic for Real-Time System Specification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
interval temporal logic
0.012001
An Interval Logic for Real-Time System Specification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.012001
An Interval Logic for Real-Time System Specification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving
0.012001
An Interval Logic for Real-Time System Specification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

theorem proving · 0.1tableaux algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 An Interval Logic for Real-Time System Specification
abstract
Formal techniques for the specification of real time systems must be capable of describing system behavior as a set of relationships expressing the temporal constraints among events and actions, including properties of invariance, precedence, periodicity, liveness, and safety conditions. The paper describes a Temporal-Interval Logic with Compositional Operators (TILCO) designed expressly for the specification of real time systems. TILCO is a generalization of classical temporal logics based on the operators, eventually and henceforth; it allows both qualitative and quantitative specification of time relationships. TILCO is based on time intervals and can concisely express temporal constraints with time bounds, such as those needed to specify real time systems. This approach can be used to verify the completeness and consistency of specifications, as well as to validate system behavior against its requirements and general properties. TILCO has been formalized by using the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. TILCO specifications satisfying certain properties are executable by using a modified version of the Tableaux algorithm. The paper defines TILCO and its axiomatization, highlights the tools available for proving properties of specifications and for their execution, and provides an example of system specification and validation.
Riccardo Mattolini, Paolo Nesi
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1996 Using TILCO for Specifying Real-Time Systems
abstract
The Temporal Interval Logic with Compositional Operators (TILCO) has been especially designed for the specification and validation of real-time systems. TILCO extends the classical temporal logics based on the operators eventually, and henceforth by using time intervals in order to allow the specification of both qualitative and quantitative temporal relationships. The use of time intervals also supports an abstract and synthetic style for specifying real-time systems. The validation of TILCO specifications is supported by means of property proving; direct execution of specifications and model-checking of system histories are also possible. Therefore, the TILCO model can be considered as a dual approach. This paper describes TILCO and shows with an example its application for the specification and validation of real-time systems. Highlights about the TILCO axiomatization are given and the tools available for proving properties of specifications and for specifications execution are discussed.
Riccardo Mattolini, Paolo Nesi
ICECCS1
1995 Automatic transition from rapid prototyping to target code for distributed systems
abstract
High level operational languages support the specification and validation of complex reactive systems through the automatic generation of rapid prototypes since the early stages of the development lifecycle. However, when it comes to the implementation stage, these prototypes must be translated into target code to accomplish performance requirements without losing validation results. A transformation method supporting the incremental and automatic transition from rapid prototypes to target code is presented, which relies on a Petri net based specification language. Experimental results are presented to evaluate the performance improvement achieved by this automatic transformation.>
Giacomo Bucci, Riccardo Mattolini, Enrico Vicario
ISADS2
1993 A framework for the development of object-oriented distributed systems
abstract
A framework for the development of distributed object-oriented systems in heterogeneous environments is presented. This model attempts to incorporate concepts of distributed computing technology together with software engineering methods. A tool has been developed to enforce the model by means of a high-level specification language and an automatic code generator. However, it is emphasized that the model may be exploited as a methodologic foundation even outside an automatic generation approach.>
Giacomo Bucci, Riccardo Mattolini, Enrico Vicario
ISADS2