Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kin-Shing D. Cheng

dblp:17/4562 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
point cloud reconstruction
0.112007
Design and Analysis of Optimization Methods for Subdivision Surface Fitting · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2007
Geometric modeling and processing › subdivision surfaces
subdivision surface fitting
0.112007
Design and Analysis of Optimization Methods for Subdivision Surface Fitting · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2007
Mathematical optimization › least squares
nonlinear least squares
0.012007
Design and Analysis of Optimization Methods for Subdivision Surface Fitting · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

newton method · 0.1levenberg-marquardt · 0.1gradient descent · 0.1gauss-newton · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Design and Analysis of Optimization Methods for Subdivision Surface Fitting
abstract
We present a complete framework for computing a subdivision surface to approximate unorganized point sample data, which is a separable nonlinear least squares problem. We study the convergence and stability of three geometrically-motivated optimization schemes and reveal their intrinsic relations with standard methods for constrained nonlinear optimization. A commonly-used method in graphics, called point distance minimization, is shown to use a variant of the gradient descent step and thus has only linear convergence. The second method, called tangent distance minimization, which is well-known in computer vision, is shown to use the Gauss-Newton step, and thus demonstrates near quadratic convergence for zero residual problems but may not converge otherwise. Finally, we show that an optimization scheme called squared distance minimization, recently proposed by Pottmann et al., can be derived from the Newton method. Hence, with proper regularization, tangent distance minimization and squared distance minimization are more efficient than point distance minimization. We also investigate the effects of two step size control methods -- Levenberg-Marquardt regularization and the Armijo rule -- on the convergence stability and efficiency of the above optimization schemes.
Kin-Shing D. Cheng, Wenping Wang 0001, Hong Qin 0001, Kwan-Yee Kenneth Wong, Huaiping Yang, Yang Liu 0014
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1
2004 Fitting Subdivision Surfaces to Unorganized Point Data Using SDM
abstract
We study the reconstruction of smooth surfaces from point clouds. We use a new squared distance error term in optimization to fit a subdivision surface to a set of unorganized points, which defines a closed target surface of arbitrary topology. The resulting method is based on the framework of squared distance minimization (SDM) proposed by Pottmann et al. Specifically, with an initial subdivision surface having a coarse control mesh as input, we adjust the control points by optimizing an objective function through iterative minimization of a quadratic approximant of the squared distance function of the target shape. Our experiments show that the new method (SDM) converges much faster than the commonly used optimization method using the point distance error function, which is known to have only linear convergence. This observation is further supported by our recent result that SDM can be derived from the Newton method with necessary modifications to make the Hessian positive definite and the fact that the Newton method has quadratic convergence.
Kin-Shing D. Cheng, Wenping Wang 0001, Hong Qin 0001, Kwan-Yee Kenneth Wong, Huaiping Yang, Yang Liu 0014
PG1