Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

André Elisseeff

dblp:17/5414 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
24ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 21 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
14 papers
Learning theory · 26% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 26 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.252005
Semi-supervised protein classification using cluster kernels · Bioinform. 2005
Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
Semi-supervised Protein Classification Using Cluster Kernels · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.222008
Using Markov Blankets for Causal Structure Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Finding Latent Causes in Causal Networks: an Efficient Approach Based on Markov Blankets · NIPS 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
protein classification
0.122005
Semi-supervised protein classification using cluster kernels · Bioinform. 2005
Semi-supervised Protein Classification Using Cluster Kernels · NIPS 2003
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.112008
Finding Latent Causes in Causal Networks: an Efficient Approach Based on Markov Blankets · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.122003
Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
markov blanket
0.112008
Finding Latent Causes in Causal Networks: an Efficient Approach Based on Markov Blankets · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
markov blanket discovery
0.112008
Using Markov Blankets for Causal Structure Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.122005
Stability of Randomized Learning Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005
Algorithmic Stability and Generalization Performance · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized learning
0.012003
Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
transductive learning
0.012003
Feature selection and transduction for prediction of molecular bioactivity for drug design · Bioinform. 2003
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
variable selection
0.012003
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
bioactivity prediction
0.012003
Feature selection and transduction for prediction of molecular bioactivity for drug design · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug design
0.012003
Feature selection and transduction for prediction of molecular bioactivity for drug design · Bioinform. 2003
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel dependency estimation
0.012002
Kernel Dependency Estimation · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
stability and generalization
0.012002
Stability and Generalization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2002
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › similarity measure
centered kernel alignment
0.012001
On Kernel-Target Alignment · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory › ranking
large margin ranking
0.012001
A kernel method for multi-labelled classification · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.012001
On Kernel-Target Alignment · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification
0.012001
A kernel method for multi-labelled classification · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
algorithmic stability
0.012000
Algorithmic Stability and Generalization Performance · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.012008
Using Markov Blankets for Causal Structure Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
bagging
0.012005
Stability of Randomized Learning Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
exact learning
0.011996
Size of Multilayer Networks for Exact Learning: Analytic Approach · NIPS 1996
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
multilayer neural network
0.011996
Size of Multilayer Networks for Exact Learning: Analytic Approach · NIPS 1996
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
transduction
0.012001
On Kernel-Target Alignment · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.012000
Algorithmic Stability and Generalization Performance · NIPS 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cluster kernels · 0.2feature selection · 0.1stability analysis · 0.1string kernels · 0.1string kernel · 0.1markov blanket · 0.1conditional independence test · 0.1causal discovery · 0.1FCI algorithm · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1semi-supervised learning · 0.1bagging · 0.1transductive learning · 0.0analytic approach · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Finding Latent Causes in Causal Networks: an Efficient Approach Based on Markov Blankets
abstract
Causal structure-discovery techniques usually assume that all causes of more than one variable are observed. This is the so-called causal sufficiency assumption. In practice, it is untestable, and often violated. In this paper, we present an efficient causal structure-learning algorithm, suited for causally insufficient data. Similar to algorithms such as IC* and FCI, the proposed approach drops the causal sufficiency assumption and learns a structure that indicates (potential) latent causes for pairs of observed variables. Assuming a constant local density of the data-generating graph, our algorithm makes a quadratic number of conditional-independence tests w.r.t. the number of variables. We show with experiments that our algorithm is comparable to the state-of-the-art FCI algorithm in accuracy, while being several orders of magnitude faster on large problems. We conclude that MBCS* makes a new range of causally insufficient problems computationally tractable.
Jean-Philippe Pellet, André Elisseeff
NIPS2
2008 Explanation Trees for Causal Bayesian Networks
Ulf H. Nielsen, Jean-Philippe Pellet, André Elisseeff
UAI3
2008 Using Markov Blankets for Causal Structure Learning
Jean-Philippe Pellet, André Elisseeff
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2007 A Partial Correlation-Based Algorithm for Causal Structure Discovery with Continuous Variables
Jean-Philippe Pellet, André Elisseeff
IDA2
2007 Guest editorial: Learning theory
Olivier Bousquet, André Elisseeff
Mach. Learn.2
2005 Efficient Allocation of Marketing Resources using Dynamic Programming
abstract
In this paper we address the following question: how to estimate a Markov Decision Process modeling the dynamics of customer relationships. Once the model is estimated, we discuss how to efficiently allocate marketing resources and instruments in order to maximize the long-term value generated by customers in a given future time horizon using dynamic programming. Our methodology allows us both to predict and to optimize the future value generated by customers. We show our approach using a case study involving a major European airline.
Giuliano Tirenni, Abderrahim Labbi, André Elisseeff, Cesar Berrospi
SDM3
2005 Semi-supervised protein classification using cluster kernels
abstract
MOTIVATION: Building an accurate protein classification system depends critically upon choosing a good representation of the input sequences of amino acids. Recent work using string kernels for protein data has achieved state-of-the-art classification performance. However, such representations are based only on labeled data--examples with known 3D structures, organized into structural classes--whereas in practice, unlabeled data are far more plentiful. RESULTS: In this work, we develop simple and scalable cluster kernel techniques for incorporating unlabeled data into the representation of protein sequences. We show that our methods greatly improve the classification performance of string kernels and outperform standard approaches for using unlabeled data, such as adding close homologs of the positive examples to the training data. We achieve equal or superior performance to previously presented cluster kernel methods and at the same time achieving far greater computational efficiency. AVAILABILITY: Source code is available at www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bs/people/weston/semiprot. The Spider matlab package is available at www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bs/people/spider. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bs/people/weston/semiprot.
Jason Weston, Christina S. Leslie, Eugene Ie, Dengyong Zhou, André Elisseeff, William Stafford Noble
Bioinform.5
2005 Stability of Randomized Learning Algorithms
abstract
We extend existing theory on stability, namely how much changes in the training data influence the estimated models, and generalization performance of deterministic learning algorithms to the case of randomized algorithms. We give formal definitions of stability for randomized algorithms and prove non-asymptotic bounds on the difference between the empirical and expected error as well as the leave-one-out and expected error of such algorithms that depend on their random stability. The setup we develop for this purpose can be also used for generally studying randomized learning algorithms. We then use these general results to study the effects of bagging on the stability of a learning method and to prove non-asymptotic bounds on the predictive performance of bagging which have not been possible to prove with the existing theory of stability for deterministic learning algorithms.
André Elisseeff, Theodoros Evgeniou, Massimiliano Pontil
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2004 Combining protein secondary structure prediction models with ensemble methods of optimal complexity
Yann Guermeur, Gianluca Pollastri, André Elisseeff, Dominique Zelus, Hélène Paugam-Moisy, Pierre Baldi
Neurocomputing3
2004 Leave One Out Error, Stability, and Generalization of Voting Combinations of Classifiers
Theodoros Evgeniou, Massimiliano Pontil, André Elisseeff
Mach. Learn.3
2003 Semi-supervised Protein Classification Using Cluster Kernels
abstract
A key issue in supervised protein classification is the representation of in- put sequences of amino acids. Recent work using string kernels for pro- tein data has achieved state-of-the-art classification performance. How- ever, such representations are based only on labeled data — examples with known 3D structures, organized into structural classes — while in practice, unlabeled data is far more plentiful. In this work, we de- velop simple and scalable cluster kernel techniques for incorporating un- labeled data into the representation of protein sequences. We show that our methods greatly improve the classification performance of string ker- nels and outperform standard approaches for using unlabeled data, such as adding close homologs of the positive examples to the training data. We achieve equal or superior performance to previously presented cluster kernel methods while achieving far greater computational efficiency.
Jason Weston, Christina S. Leslie, Dengyong Zhou, André Elisseeff, William Stafford Noble
NIPS4
2003 Feature selection and transduction for prediction of molecular bioactivity for drug design
abstract
Abstract Motivation: In drug discovery a key task is to identify characteristics that separate active (binding) compounds from inactive (non-binding) ones. An automated prediction system can help reduce resources necessary to carry out this task. Results: Two methods for prediction of molecular bioactivity for drug design are introduced and shown to perform well in a data set previously studied as part of the KDD (Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining) Cup 2001. The data is characterized by very few positive examples, a very large number of features (describing three-dimensional properties of the molecules) and rather different distributions between training and test data. Two techniques are introduced specifically to tackle these problems: a feature selection method for unbalanced data and a classifier which adapts to the distribution of the the unlabeled test data (a so-called transductive method). We show both techniques improve identification performance and in conjunction provide an improvement over using only one of the techniques. Our results suggest the importance of taking into account the characteristics in this data which may also be relevant in other problems of a similar type. Availability: Matlab source code is available at http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bs/people/weston/kdd/kdd.html Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary material is available at http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bs/people/weston/kdd/kdd.html. * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jason Weston, Fernando Pérez-Cruz, Olivier Bousquet, Olivier Chapelle, André Elisseeff, Bernhard Schölkopf
Bioinform.5
2003 An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection
Isabelle Guyon, André Elisseeff
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2003 Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods
Jason Weston, André Elisseeff, Bernhard Schölkopf, Michael E. Tipping
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2002 A Simple Algorithm for Learning Stable Machines
Savina Andonova, André Elisseeff, Theodoros Evgeniou, Massimiliano Pontil
ECAI2
2002 Kernel Dependency Estimation
abstract
We consider the learning problem of finding a dependency between a general class of objects and another, possibly different, general class of objects. The objects can be for example: vectors, images, strings, trees or graphs. Such a task is made possible by employing similarity measures in both input and output spaces using ker(cid:173) nel functions, thus embedding the objects into vector spaces. We experimentally validate our approach on several tasks: mapping strings to strings, pattern recognition, and reconstruction from par(cid:173) tial images.
Jason Weston, Olivier Chapelle, André Elisseeff, Bernhard Schölkopf, Vladimir Vapnik
NIPS3
2002 Stability and Generalization
Olivier Bousquet, André Elisseeff
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2001 On Kernel-Target Alignment
abstract
We introduce the notion of kernel-alignment, a measure of similar(cid:173) ity between two kernel functions or between a kernel and a target function. This quantity captures the degree of agreement between a kernel and a given learning task, and has very natural interpre(cid:173) tations in machine learning, leading also to simple algorithms for model selection and learning. We analyse its theoretical properties, proving that it is sharply concentrated around its expected value, and we discuss its relation with other standard measures of per(cid:173) formance. Finally we describe some of the algorithms that can be obtained within this framework, giving experimental results show(cid:173) ing that adapting the kernel to improve alignment on the labelled data significantly increases the alignment on the test set, giving improved classification accuracy. Hence, the approach provides a principled method of performing transduction. Keywords: Kernels, alignment, eigenvectors, eigenvalues, transduction
Nello Cristianini, John Shawe-Taylor, André Elisseeff, Jaz S. Kandola
NIPS3
2001 A kernel method for multi-labelled classification
abstract
This article presents a Support Vector Machine (SVM) like learning sys- tem to handle multi-label problems. Such problems are usually decom- posed into many two-class problems but the expressive power of such a system can be weak [5, 7]. We explore a new direct approach. It is based on a large margin ranking system that shares a lot of common proper- ties with SVMs. We tested it on a Yeast gene functional classification problem with positive results.
André Elisseeff, Jason Weston
NIPS1
2000 A New Multi-Class SVM Based on a Uniform Convergence Result
abstract
We introduce a support vector machine devoted to the approximation of multi-class discriminant functions. Its training procedure consists in minimizing an expression of the guaranteed risk. This bound is significantly tighter than the former ones, which should make the implementation of the structural risk minimization inductive principle in the context of multi-class discrimination better grounded.
Yann Guermeur, André Elisseeff, Hélène Paugam-Moisy
IJCNN (4)2
2000 Generalization Performance of Multiclass Discriminant Models
abstract
Starting from a direct definition of the notion of margin in the multiclass case, we study the generalization performance of multiclass discriminant systems. In the framework of statistical learning theory, we establish on this performance a bound based on covering numbers. An application to a linear ensemble method which estimates the class posterior probabilities provides us with a way to compare this bound and another one based on combinatorial dimensions, with respect to the capacity measure they incorporate. Experimental results highlight their usefulness for a real-world problem.
Hélène Paugam-Moisy, André Elisseeff, Yann Guermeur
IJCNN (4)2
2000 Algorithmic Stability and Generalization Performance
abstract
We present a novel way of obtaining PAC-style bounds on the gen(cid:173) eralization error of learning algorithms, explicitly using their stabil(cid:173) ity properties. A stable learner is one for which the learned solution does not change much with small changes in the training set. The bounds we obtain do not depend on any measure of the complexity of the hypothesis space (e.g. VC dimension) but rather depend on how the learning algorithm searches this space, and can thus be applied even when the VC dimension is infinite. We demonstrate that regularization networks possess the required stability property and apply our method to obtain new bounds on their generalization performance.
Olivier Bousquet, André Elisseeff
NIPS2
1999 JNN, a randomized algorithm for training multilayer networks in polynomial time
André Elisseeff, Hélène Paugam-Moisy
Neurocomputing1
1996 Size of Multilayer Networks for Exact Learning: Analytic Approach
André Elisseeff, Hélène Paugam-Moisy
NIPS1