Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hao Li 0074
dblp:17/5705-74
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9923-4346ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 9 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Language models and text generation · 22% Generative modeling · 19% Efficient and distributed learning · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 77% Data mining · 23% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
argument summarization |
1.7 | 2 | 2026 | Arg-LLaDA: Argument Summarization via Large Language Diffusion Models and Sufficiency-Aware Refinement · ACL (1) 2026 Do You Hear The People Sing? Key Point Analysis via Iterative Clustering and Abstractive Summarisation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | BRIDGE: Bootstrapping Text to Control Time-Series Generation via Multi-Agent Iterative Optimization and Diffusion Modeling · ICML 2025 Arg-LLaDA: Argument Summarization via Large Language Diffusion Models and Sufficiency-Aware Refinement · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
continual pre-training |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Mixing Agent: Learning to Re-weight Domains for Continual Pre-training · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Mixing Agent: Learning to Re-weight Domains for Continual Pre-training · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
data mixture optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Mixing Agent: Learning to Re-weight Domains for Continual Pre-training · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Mixing Agent: Learning to Re-weight Domains for Continual Pre-training · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › instance weighting
domain reweighting |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Mixing Agent: Learning to Re-weight Domains for Continual Pre-training · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MIRA: Medical Time Series Foundation Model for Real-World Health Data · NeurIPS 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › LLM-based multi-agent systems
LLM-based multi-agent framework |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BRIDGE: Bootstrapping Text to Control Time-Series Generation via Multi-Agent Iterative Optimization and Diffusion Modeling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does Acceleration Cause Hidden Instability in Vision Language Models? Uncovering Instance-Level Divergence Through a Large-Scale Empirical Study · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does Acceleration Cause Hidden Instability in Vision Language Models? Uncovering Instance-Level Divergence Through a Large-Scale Empirical Study · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
time series foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MIRA: Medical Time Series Foundation Model for Real-World Health Data · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
time series generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BRIDGE: Bootstrapping Text to Control Time-Series Generation via Multi-Agent Iterative Optimization and Diffusion Modeling · ICML 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical time series |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MIRA: Medical Time Series Foundation Model for Real-World Health Data · NeurIPS 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › electronic health records
electronic health record synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TarDiff: Target-Oriented Diffusion Guidance for Synthetic Electronic Health Record Time Series Generation · KDD (2) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › argument mining
key point analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Do You Hear The People Sing? Key Point Analysis via Iterative Clustering and Abstractive Summarisation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
language model probing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Not all quantifiers are equal: Probing Transformer-based language models' understanding of generalised quantifiers · EMNLP 2023 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
summarization evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Do You Hear The People Sing? Key Point Analysis via Iterative Clustering and Abstractive Summarisation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional diffusion model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | TarDiff: Target-Oriented Diffusion Guidance for Synthetic Electronic Health Record Time Series Generation · KDD (2) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Does Acceleration Cause Hidden Instability in Vision Language Models? Uncovering Instance-Level Divergence Through a Large-Scale Empirical Study · EMNLP 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MIRA: Medical Time Series Foundation Model for Real-World Health Data · NeurIPS 2025 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Do You Hear The People Sing? Key Point Analysis via Iterative Clustering and Abstractive Summarisation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 2.6sufficiency-aware refinement · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0large language diffusion models · 1.0domain re-weighting agent · 1.0token reduction · 0.9semantic prototype · 0.9rotary positional encoding · 0.9quantization · 0.9neural ODE · 0.9multi-agent iterative optimization · 0.9mixture of experts · 0.9large language model · 0.9influence functions · 0.9neural topic modeling · 0.7iterative clustering · 0.7abstractive summarization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Arg-LLaDA: Argument Summarization via Large Language Diffusion Models and Sufficiency-Aware RefinementabstractHao Li, Yizheng Sun, Viktor Schlegel, Kailai Yang, Riza Batista-Navarro, Goran Nenadic. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Hao Li 0074, Yizheng Sun, Viktor Schlegel, Kailai Yang, Riza Theresa Batista-Navarro, Goran Nenadic |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2026 | Data Mixing Agent: Learning to Re-weight Domains for Continual Pre-trainingabstractKailai Yang, Xiao Liu, Lei Ji, Hao Li, Xiao Liang, Zhiwei Liu, Yeyun Gong, Peng Cheng, Mao Yang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Kailai Yang, Xiao Liu 0029, Lei Ji 0001, Hao Li 0074, Zhiwei Liu 0003, Yeyun Gong, Peng Cheng 0005, Mao Yang 0004 |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | Does Acceleration Cause Hidden Instability in Vision Language Models? Uncovering Instance-Level Divergence Through a Large-Scale Empirical StudyabstractVision-Language Models (VLMs) are powerful yet computationally intensive for widespread practical deployments.To address such challenge without costly re-training, post-training acceleration techniques like quantization and token reduction are extensively explored.However, current acceleration evaluations primarily target minimal overall performance degradation, overlooking a crucial question: does the accelerated model still give the same answers to the same questions as it did before acceleration?This is vital for stability-centered industrial applications where consistently correct answers for specific, known situations are paramount, such as in AI-based disease diagnosis.We systematically investigate this for accelerated VLMs, testing four leading models (LLaVA-1.5,LLaVA-Next, Qwen2-VL, Qwen2.5-VL) with eight acceleration methods on ten multimodal benchmarks.Our findings are stark: despite minimal aggregate performance drops, accelerated models changed original answers up to 20% of the time.Critically, up to 6.5% of these changes converted correct answers to incorrect.Input perturbations magnified these inconsistencies, and the trend is confirmed by case studies with the medical VLM LLaVA-Med.This research reveals a significant oversight in VLM acceleration, stressing an urgent need for instance-level stability checks to ensure trustworthy real-world deployment. Yizheng Sun, Hao Li 0074, Chang Xu 0008, Hongpeng Zhou, Chenghua Lin 0002, Riza Theresa Batista-Navarro |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | BRIDGE: Bootstrapping Text to Control Time-Series Generation via Multi-Agent Iterative Optimization and Diffusion ModelingabstractTime-series Generation (TSG) is a prominent research area with broad applications in simulations, data augmentation, and counterfactual analysis. While existing methods have shown promise in unconditional single-domain TSG, real-world applications demand for cross-domain approaches capable of controlled generation tailored to domain-specific constraints and instance-level requirements. In this paper, we argue that text can provide semantic insights, domain information and instance-specific temporal patterns, to guide and improve TSG. We introduce “Text-Controlled TSG”, a task focused on generating realistic time series by incorporating textual descriptions. To address data scarcity in this setting, we propose a novel LLM-based Multi-Agent framework that synthesizes diverse, realistic text-to-TS datasets. Furthermore, we introduce Bridge, a hybrid text-controlled TSG framework that integrates semantic prototypes with text description for supporting domain-level guidance. This approach achieves state-of-the-art generation fidelity on 11 of 12 datasets, and improves controllability by up to 12% on MSE and 6% MAE compared to no text input generation, highlighting its potential for generating tailored time-series data. Hao Li 0074, Yu-Hao Huang 0002, Chang Xu 0008, Viktor Schlegel, Renhe Jiang, Riza Theresa Batista-Navarro, Goran Nenadic, Jiang Bian 0002 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | TarDiff: Target-Oriented Diffusion Guidance for Synthetic Electronic Health Record Time Series GenerationabstractSynthetic Electronic Health Record (EHR) time-series generation is crucial for advancing clinical machine learning models, as it helps address data scarcity by providing more training data. However, most existing approaches focus primarily on replicating statistical distributions and temporal dependencies of real-world data. We argue that fidelity to observed data alone does not guarantee better model performance, as common patterns may dominate, limiting the representation of rare but important conditions. This highlights the need for generate synthetic samples to improve performance of specific clinical models to fulfill their target outcomes. To address this, we propose TarDiff, a novel target-oriented diffusion framework that integrates task-specific influence guidance into the synthetic data generation process. Unlike conventional approaches that mimic training data distributions, TarDiff optimizes synthetic samples by quantifying their expected contribution to improving downstream model performance through influence functions. Specifically, we measure the reduction in task-specific loss induced by synthetic samples and embed this influence gradient into the reverse diffusion process, thereby steering the generation towards utility-optimized data. Evaluated on six publicly available EHR datasets, TarDiff achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming existing methods by up to 20.4% in AUPRC and 18.4% in AUROC. Our results demonstrate that TarDiff not only preserves temporal fidelity but also enhances downstream model performance, offering a robust solution to data scarcity and class imbalance in healthcare analytics. Chang Xu 0008, Hao Li 0074, Yu-Hao Huang 0002, Min Hou 0004, Jiang Bian 0002 |
KDD (2) | 3 |
| 2025 | MIRA: Medical Time Series Foundation Model for Real-World Health DataabstractA unified foundation model for medical time series—pretrained on open access and ethically reviewed medical corpora—offers the potential to reduce annotation burdens, minimize model customization, and enable robust transfer across clinical institutions, modalities, and tasks, particularly in data-scarce or privacy-constrained environments. However, existing time series foundation models struggle to handle medical time series data due to its inherent challenges, including irregular intervals, heterogeneous sampling rates, and frequent missingness. To address these challenges, we introduce MIRA, a unified foundation model specifically designed for medical time series forecasting. MIRA incorporates a Continuous-Time Rotary Positional Encoding that enables fine-grained modeling of variable time intervals, a frequency-specific mixture-of-experts layer that routes computation across latent frequency regimes to further promote temporal specialization, and a Continuous Dynamics Extrapolation Block based on Neural ODE that models the continuous trajectory of latent states, enabling accurate forecasting at arbitrary target timestamps. Pretrained on a large-scale and diverse medical corpus comprising over 454 billion time points collect from publicly available datasets, MIRA achieving reductions in forecasting errors by an average of 8% and 6% in out-of-distribution and in-distribution scenarios, respectively. We also introduce a comprehensive benchmark spanning multiple downstream clinical tasks, establishing a foundation for future research in medical time series modeling. Hao Li 0074, Chang Xu 0008, Zhiyuan Feng, Viktor Schlegel, Yu-Hao Huang 0002, Yizheng Sun, Kailai Yang, Yiyao Yu, Jiang Bian 0002 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | A user-generated content-based social network large-scale group decision-making approach in healthcare service: Case study of general practitioners selection in UK
Yuanyuan Liang, Yanbing Ju, Xiaojun Zeng, Hao Li 0074, Peiwu Dong, Tian Ju |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 4 |
| 2023 | Do You Hear The People Sing? Key Point Analysis via Iterative Clustering and Abstractive SummarisationabstractArgument summarisation is a promising but currently under-explored field.Recent work has aimed to provide textual summaries in the form of concise and salient short texts, i.e., key points (KPs), in a task known as Key Point Analysis (KPA).One of the main challenges in KPA is finding high-quality key point candidates from dozens of arguments even in a small corpus.Furthermore, evaluating key points is crucial in ensuring that the automatically generated summaries are useful.Although automatic methods for evaluating summarisation have considerably advanced over the years, they mainly focus on sentence-level comparison, making it difficult to measure the quality of a summary (a set of KPs) as a whole.Aggravating this problem is the fact that human evaluation is costly and unreproducible.To address the above issues, we propose a two-step abstractive summarisation framework based on neural topic modelling with an iterative clustering procedure, to generate key points which are aligned with how humans identify key points.Our experiments show that our framework advances the state of the art in KPA, with performance improvement of up to 14 (absolute) percentage points, in terms of both ROUGE and our own proposed evaluation metrics 1 .Furthermore, we evaluate the generated summaries using a novel set-based evaluation toolkit.Our quantitative analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposed evaluation metrics in assessing the quality of generated KPs.Human evaluation further demonstrates the advantages of our approach and validates that our proposed evaluation metric is more consistent with human judgment than ROUGE scores.Children express themselves through the clothes they wear and should be able to do this at school School uniform is harming the student's self expression School uniforms are expensive [...]Children should be able to dress as they wish, within reason, at school rather than being restricted from expressing themselves through their clothes.Children should be allowed to express themselves School uniform is unaffordable for many single parents and should be abandoned.School uniforms are an expense that many families can't afford.there are plenty of ways to get very cheap clothing, but discounted uniforms are more difficult to obtain.School uniforms are expensive and puts an undue burden on the parents of the students.School uniforms are expensive for the school and take money from other important programs.School unforms stifle freedom of expression.they can be costly and make circumstances difficult for those on a budget [... Hao Li 0074, Viktor Schlegel, Riza Theresa Batista-Navarro, Goran Nenadic |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Not all quantifiers are equal: Probing Transformer-based language models' understanding of generalised quantifiersabstractHow do different generalised quantifiers affect the behaviour of transformer-based language models (TLMs)?The recent popularity of TLMs and the central role generalised quantifiers have traditionally played in linguistics and logic bring this question into particular focus.The current research investigating this subject has not utilised a task defined purely in a logical sense, and thus, has not captured the underlying logical significance of generalised quantifiers.Consequently, they have not answered the aforementioned question faithfully or adequately.Therefore, we investigate how different generalised quantifiers affect TLMs by employing a textual entailment problem defined in a purely logical sense, namely, modelchecking with natural language.Our approach permits the automatic construction of datasets with respect to which we can assess the ability of TLMs to learn the meanings of generalised quantifiers.Our investigation reveals that TLMs generally can comprehend the logical semantics of the most common generalised quantifiers, but that distinct quantifiers influence TLMs in varying ways. Tharindu Madusanka, Iqra Zahid, Hao Li 0074, Ian Pratt-Hartmann, Riza Theresa Batista-Navarro |
EMNLP | 3 |