Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael von der Beeck

dblp:17/5851 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
6as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 6 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 60% Programming languages and type systems · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
compositionality
0.012000
A compositional approach to statecharts semantics · SIGSOFT FSE 2000
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics
0.012000
A compositional approach to statecharts semantics · SIGSOFT FSE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design
reactive systems
0.012000
A compositional approach to statecharts semantics · SIGSOFT FSE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012000
A compositional approach to statecharts semantics · SIGSOFT FSE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design › software modeling
statecharts
0.012000
A compositional approach to statecharts semantics · SIGSOFT FSE 2000
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Multimodal Driver Referencing: A Comparison of Pointing to Objects Inside and Outside the Vehicle
abstract
Advanced in-cabin sensing technologies, especially vision based approaches, have tremendously progressed user interaction inside the vehicle, paving the way for new applications of natural user interaction. Just as humans use multiple modes to communicate with each other, we follow an approach which is characterized by simultaneously using multiple modalities to achieve natural human-machine interaction for a specific task: pointing to or glancing towards objects inside as well as outside the vehicle for deictic references. By tracking the movements of eye-gaze, head and finger, we design a multimodal fusion architecture using a deep neural network to precisely identify the driver’s referencing intent. Additionally, we use a speech command as a trigger to separate each referencing event. We observe differences in driver behavior in the two pointing use cases (i.e. for inside and outside objects), especially when analyzing the preciseness of the three modalities eye, head, and finger. We conclude that there is no single modality that is solely optimal for all cases as each modality reveals certain limitations. Fusion of multiple modalities exploits the relevant characteristics of each modality, hence overcoming the case dependent limitations of each individual modality. Ultimately, we propose a method to identity whether the driver’s referenced object lies inside or outside the vehicle, based on the predicted pointing direction.
Abdul Rafey Aftab, Michael von der Beeck
IUI2
2021 Multimodal Fusion Using Deep Learning Applied to Driver's Referencing of Outside-Vehicle Objects
abstract
There is a growing interest in more intelligent natural user interaction with the car. Hand gestures and speech are already being applied for driver-car interaction. Moreover, multimodal approaches are also showing promise in the automotive industry. In this paper, we utilize deep learning for a multimodal fusion network for referencing objects outside the vehicle. We use features from gaze, head pose and finger pointing simultaneously to precisely predict the referenced objects in different car poses. We demonstrate the practical limitations of each modality when used for a natural form of referencing, specifically inside the car. As evident from our results, we overcome the modality specific limitations, to a large extent, by the addition of other modalities. This work highlights the importance of multimodal sensing, especially when moving towards natural user interaction. Furthermore, our user based analysis shows noteworthy differences in recognition of user behavior depending upon the vehicle pose.
Abdul Rafey Aftab, Michael von der Beeck, Steven Rohrhirsch, Benoit Diotte, Michael Feld
IV2
2020 You Have a Point There: Object Selection Inside an Automobile Using Gaze, Head Pose and Finger Pointing
abstract
Sophisticated user interaction in the automotive industry is a fast emerging topic. Mid-air gestures and speech already have numerous applications for driver-car interaction. Additionally, multimodal approaches are being developed to leverage the use of multiple sensors for added advantages. In this paper, we propose a fast and practical multimodal fusion method based on machine learning for the selection of various control modules in an automotive vehicle. The modalities taken into account are gaze, head pose and finger pointing gesture. Speech is used only as a trigger for fusion. Single modality has previously been used numerous times for recognition of the user's pointing direction. We, however, demonstrate how multiple inputs can be fused together to enhance the recognition performance. Furthermore, we compare different deep neural network architectures against conventional Machine Learning methods, namely Support Vector Regression and Random Forests, and show the enhancements in the pointing direction accuracy using deep learning. The results suggest a great potential for the use of multimodal inputs that can be applied to more use cases in the vehicle.
Abdul Rafey Aftab, Michael von der Beeck, Michael Feld
ICMI2
2007 Development of logical and technical architectures for automotive systems
Michael von der Beeck
Softw. Syst. Model.1
2006 A Formal Semantics of UML-RT
Michael von der Beeck
MoDELS1
2002 Model Based Requirements Engineering for Embedded Software
abstract
Summary form only given. Software and systems development within the embedded area is dominated by model based design techniques. These techniques are commonly aligned to standard. modeling languages such as UML. Along with software and systems design techniques the concern of requirements management methodologies has been continuously increasing, with the aim of improving the overall development process. As a combination of both model based design techniques and requirements management methodologies, a new kind of requirements engineering methodology has been established. However, due to the complexity of this methodology and the high degree of informal aspects a unique and integrated methodology for requirements engineering is still needed. This presentation gives a survey of existing requirements classifications and motivates the use of model based requirements classification techniques. The transition of informal requirements to first models is illustrated.
Michael von der Beeck, Peter Braun 0003, Martin Rappl
RE1
2002 A structured operational semantics for UML-statecharts
Michael von der Beeck
Softw. Syst. Model.1
2001 Truths and Beliefs about the Use of Real-Time Distributed Object Computing in Complex Industrial Applications
Carlos Eduardo Pereira, Ricardo Sanz Bravo, Michael von der Beeck, Michael Kircher
ISORC3
2000 A Concise Compositionalj Statecharts Semantics Definition
Michael von der Beeck
FORTE1
2000 A compositional approach to statecharts semantics
abstract
Statecharts is a visual language for specifying reactive system behavior. The formalism extends traditional finite-state machines with notions of hierarchy and concurrency, and it is used in many popular software design notations. A large part of the appeal of Statecharts derives from its basis in state machines, with their intuitive operational interpretation. The classical semantics of Statecharts, however, suffers from a serious defect; it is not compositional, meaning that the behavior of system descriptions cannot be inferred from the behavior of their subsystems. Compositionality is a prerequisite for exploiting the modular structure of Statecharts for simulation, verification, and code generation, and it also provides the necessary foundation for reusability.
Gerald Lüttgen, Michael von der Beeck, Rance Cleaveland
SIGSOFT FSE2
1999 Statecharts Via Process Algebra
Gerald Lüttgen, Michael von der Beeck, Rance Cleaveland
CONCUR2
1993 Improving Structured Analysis - Achieving Preciseness, Executability, and Real-Time Specification
Michael von der Beeck
Requirements Engineering1