Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Dominique Bolignano

dblp:17/5908 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 4 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
protocol verification
0.131998
Integrating Proof-Based and Model-Checking Techniques for the Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols · CAV 1998
Towards a Mechanization of Cryptographic Protocal Verification · CAV 1997
An Approach to the Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols · CCS 1996
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.011998
Integrating Proof-Based and Model-Checking Techniques for the Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols · CAV 1998
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › security protocol analysis
authentication protocol analysis
0.011996
An Approach to the Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols · CCS 1996
Automated reasoning and model checking › formal methods for security
security protocol analysis
0.011996
An Approach to the Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols · CCS 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal logic · 0.0formal methods · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Federated Attested Custody for Blockchain Assets under Post-Quantum Uncertainty
Dominique Bolignano
SECRYPT (1)1
2018 Security Filters for IoT Domain Isolation
Dominique Bolignano, Florence Plateau
ISoLA (4)1
2013 Applying Formal Methods in the Large
Dominique Bolignano
ITP1
1998 Integrating Proof-Based and Model-Checking Techniques for the Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols
Dominique Bolignano
CAV1
1997 Towards a Mechanization of Cryptographic Protocal Verification
Dominique Bolignano
CAV1
1997 Towards the Formal Verification of Electronic Commerce Protocols
abstract
Generalizes the approach defined by the author in Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. on Comput. & Commun. Security (1996) so as to be able to formally verify electronic payment protocols. The original approach is based on the use of general-purpose formal methods. It is complementary with modal logic-based approaches as it allows for a description of protocols, hypotheses and authentication properties at a finer level of precision and with more freedom. The proposed generalization mainly requires being able to express and verify payment properties. Such properties are indeed much more elaborate than authentication ones and require a significant generalization in the way properties are expressed. The modelling of the protocol and of the potential knowledge held by intruders, on the other hand, is left unchanged. The approach is currently being applied to the C-SET and SET (secure electronic transactions) protocols, and has already led to significant results.
Dominique Bolignano
CSFW1
1996 An Approach to the Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols
abstract
We present an approach to the verification of authentication protocols.The approach is based on the use of general purpose formal methods.It is complementary with modal logic based-approach{~S as it allows for a description of protocol, hypotheses and authentication properties at a finer level of precision and with more freedom.It differs from formal methods based approaches and in particular from Meadows' approach in that it focuses more on proof conciseness and readability than on proof automatization.To achieve this we use a clear separation between the modeling of reliable agents and that of unreliable agents or more generally of intruders.We also show how to express authentication properties using basic and precise temporal notions.The approach is presented by the mean of an application example based on a public key version of the Needham-Schroeder protocol.
Dominique Bolignano
CCS1
1992 Higher Order Communication Processes with Value-Passing, Assignment and Return of Results
Dominique Bolignano, Mourad Debbabi
ISAAC1