Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keith A. Duke

dblp:17/6069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 57% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 43%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.011980
Alex: A conversational, hierarchical logic design system · DAC 1980
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.021980
Alex: A conversational, hierarchical logic design system · DAC 1980
A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction
error-correcting codes
0.011973
Lookaside Techniques for Minimum Circuit Memory Translators · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error correction
0.011973
Lookaside Techniques for Minimum Circuit Memory Translators · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction › error-correcting codes
SECDED
0.011973
Lookaside Techniques for Minimum Circuit Memory Translators · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design for testability
built-in self-test
0.011971
A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
self-checking circuits
0.011971
A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

high-level graphic language · 0.0parity check matrix · 0.0hamming code · 0.0firmware-based correction · 0.0book review · 0.0self-checking logic design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 Alex: A conversational, hierarchical logic design system
abstract
A fresh look at the technical problems of present-day logic design and at the principal activities of the logic designer resulted in a system for hierarchical logic design. It is supported by a novel, high-level graphic language to describe the connections between logical devices. A major concern was to ensure that processes invoked by a user while designing, modifying and testing logic normally require only a few seconds or, on rare occasions, a few minutes to execute.
Keith A. Duke, Klim Maling
DAC1
1974 B 74-26 Discrete Mathematical Structures and Their Applications
abstract
Computer Science bears approximately the same relationship to computers as Aerodynamics bears to sailboats. It describes how they work but has little impact on their design which is based almost entirely on intuition strengthened and controlled by experience. However, one day, the Wright brothers of the "ultra-computer" will get to their Kitty Hawk and Computer Science will come into its own. In preparation for that day stands the present volume. It is an excellent mathematics textbook written by an experienced teacher.
Keith A. Duke
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1973 Lookaside Techniques for Minimum Circuit Memory Translators
abstract
This paper demonstrates two improvements in coding techniques that could be used for memory word coding. First, within the fixed structure of a Hamming single-error-correcting, double-error-detecting (SEC/DED) code, an improvement can be obtained in circuit cost and operational speed over more conventional code implementations. Second, the mechanics of error correction in a fault-tolerant computer may be carried out via conventional hardware means or by use of the existing system facilities, such as the combination of the microprogram unit, local store, and the arithmetic-logic unit. These improvements may be obtained by the use of Rotational Coding schemes in conjunction with a technique calied "lookaside correction." This paper first shows a generalized algorithm for specifying the parity check matrix of Rotational Codes. The structure implemented by the parity check matrix in this paper is not merely encoding and decoding circuitry, but translates between Rotational Code forms and byte-parity encoded forms. The unique feature of these translators is that use of the Rotational Code permits the error correction to be performed on only a subset of the data word bits, and only if a single-error condition has been detected. The correction mechanism may be either a hardware logic circuit or firmware. The paper concludes with a comparison of the circuit requirements and correctional speed of the Hamming (72, 64) single-error-correcting, double-error-detecting code, as it normally would be implemented, and a Rotational Code translator also operating on 64 data bits and 8 check bits.
William C. Carter, Keith A. Duke, Donald C. Jessep Jr.
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1971 A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit
abstract
A method is given of designing a simple self-checking and self-testing decoder checking circuit which uses much less circuitry than previous checkers. An analysis is given of the circuit savings and of the probability of erroneous decoder operation before error detection.
William C. Carter, Keith A. Duke, Donald C. Jessep
IEEE Trans. Computers2