Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wolfgang Kinzel
dblp:17/6725
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key exchange |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Synchronization of neural networks by mutual learning and its application to cryptography · NIPS 2004 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
neural cryptography |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Synchronization of neural networks by mutual learning and its application to cryptography · NIPS 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical physics · 0.0mutual learning · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Synchronization of neural networks by mutual learning and its application to cryptographyabstractTwo neural networks that are trained on their mutual output synchronize to an identical time dependant weight vector. This novel phenomenon can be used for creation of a secure cryptographic secret-key using a public channel. Several models for this cryptographic system have been suggested, and have been tested for their security under different sophis- ticated attack strategies. The most promising models are networks that involve chaos synchronization. The synchronization process of mutual learning is described analytically using statistical physics methods. Einat Klein, Rachel Mislovaty, Ido Kanter, Andreas Ruttor, Wolfgang Kinzel |
NIPS | 5 |
| 1998 | Anti-Predictable Sequences: Harder to Predict Than Random SequencesabstractFor any discrete-state sequence prediction algorithm A, it is always possible, using an algorithm B no more complicated than A, to generate a sequence for which A's prediction is always wrong. For any prediction algorithm A and sequence x, there exists a sequence y no more complicated than x, such that if A performs better than random on x, then it will perform worse than random on y by the same margin. An example of a simple neural network predicting a bit sequence is used to illustrate this very general but not widely recognized phenomenon. This implies that any predictor with good performance must rely on some (usually implicitly) assumed prior distributions of the problem. Huaiyu Zhu 0001, Wolfgang Kinzel |
Neural Comput. | 2 |