Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Venkatanathan Varadarajan
dblp:17/8064
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 40% Memory systems · 24% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 15% | |
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Hardware security and side channels · 53% Systems and software security · 47% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 50% Indexing and storage engines · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 77% Learning theory · 23% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
automated machine learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Oracle AutoML: A Fast and Predictive AutoML Pipeline · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud security |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | A Placement Vulnerability Study in Multi-Tenant Public Clouds · USENIX Security Symposium 2015 Scheduler-based Defenses against Cross-VM Side-channels · USENIX Security Symposium 2014 |
Systems and software security
cloud security |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | A Placement Vulnerability Study in Multi-Tenant Public Clouds · USENIX Security Symposium 2015 Resource-freeing attacks: improve your cloud performance (at your neighbor's expense) · CCS 2012 |
Indexing and storage engines
columnar storage |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | RAPID: In-Memory Analytical Query Processing Engine with Extreme Performance per Watt · SIGMOD Conference 2018 |
Memory systems
data movement |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A many-core architecture for in-memory data processing · MICRO 2017 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
data movement acceleration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A many-core architecture for in-memory data processing · MICRO 2017 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › domain-specific accelerator
data processing accelerator |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A many-core architecture for in-memory data processing · MICRO 2017 |
Memory systems › in-memory computing
in-memory data processing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A many-core architecture for in-memory data processing · MICRO 2017 |
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks
co-resident attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Placement Vulnerability Study in Multi-Tenant Public Clouds · USENIX Security Symposium 2015 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel countermeasures |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Scheduler-based Defenses against Cross-VM Side-channels · USENIX Security Symposium 2014 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud security
cross-VM attacks |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Scheduler-based Defenses against Cross-VM Side-channels · USENIX Security Symposium 2014 |
Storage systems
file systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Aerie: flexible file-system interfaces to storage-class memory · EuroSys 2014 |
Storage systems › file systems › file system design
persistent memory file system |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Aerie: flexible file-system interfaces to storage-class memory · EuroSys 2014 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
cloud resource management |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Resource-freeing attacks: improve your cloud performance (at your neighbor's expense) · CCS 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Oracle AutoML: A Fast and Predictive AutoML Pipeline · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
many-core architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | A many-core architecture for in-memory data processing · MICRO 2017 |
Memory systems
non-volatile memory |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Aerie: flexible file-system interfaces to storage-class memory · EuroSys 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hardware-software co-design · 0.7proxy model prediction · 0.4meta-learning · 0.4scheduler-based defenses · 0.4performance measurement · 0.3hardware RPC · 0.3kernel bypass · 0.2direct access · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Oracle AutoML: A Fast and Predictive AutoML PipelineabstractMachine learning (ML) is at the forefront of the rising popularity of data-driven software applications. The resulting rapid proliferation of ML technology, explosive data growth, and shortage of data science expertise have caused the industry to face increasingly challenging demands to keep up with fast-paced develop-and-deploy model lifecycles. Recent academic and industrial research efforts have started to address this problem through automated machine learning (AutoML) pipelines and have focused on model performance as the first-order design objective. We present Oracle AutoML, a novel iteration-free AutoML pipeline designed to not only provide accurate models, but also in a shorter runtime. We are able to achieve these objectives by eliminating the need to continuously iterate over various pipeline configurations. In our feed-forward approach, each pipeline stage makes decisions based on metalearned proxy models that can predict candidate pipeline configuration performances before building the full final model. Our approach, which builds and tunes only the best candidate pipeline, achieves better scores at a fraction of the time compared to state-of-the-art open source AutoML tools, such as H2O and Auto-sklearn. This makes Oracle AutoML a prime candidate for addressing current industry challenges. Anatoly Yakovlev, Hesam Fathi Moghadam, Ali Moharrer, Jingxiao Cai, Nikan Chavoshi, Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Sandeep R. Agrawal, Tomas Karnagel, Sam Idicula, Sanjay Jinturkar, Nipun Agarwal |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 6 |
| 2018 | RAPID: In-Memory Analytical Query Processing Engine with Extreme Performance per WattabstractToday, an ever increasing amount of transistors are packed into processor designs with extra features to support a broad range of applications. As a consequence, processors are becoming more and more complex and power hungry. At the same time, they only sustain an average performance for a wide variety of applications while not providing the best performance for specific applications. In this paper, we demonstrate through a carefully designed modern data processing system called RAPID and a simple, low-power processor specially tailored for data processing that at least an order of magnitude performance/power improvement in SQL processing can be achieved over a modern system running on today's complex processors. RAPID is designed from the ground up with hardware/software co-design in mind to provide architecture-conscious extreme performance while consuming less power in comparison to the modern database systems. The paper presents in detail the design and implementation of RAPID, a relational, columnar, in-memory query processing engine supporting analytical query workloads. Cagri Balkesen, Nitin Kunal, Georgios Giannikis, Pit Fender, Seema Sundara, Felix Schmidt, Jarod Wen, Sandeep R. Agrawal, Arun Raghavan, Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Anand Viswanathan, Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran 0003, Sam Idicula, Nipun Agarwal, Eric Sedlar |
SIGMOD Conference | 10 |
| 2017 | A many-core architecture for in-memory data processingabstractFor many years, the highest energy cost in processing has been data movement rather than computation, and energy is the limiting factor in processor design [21]. As the data needed for a single application grows to exabytes [56], there is clearly an opportunity to design a bandwidth-optimized architecture for big data computation by specializing hardware for data movement. We present the Data Processing Unit or DPU, a shared memory many-core that is specifically designed for high bandwidth analytics workloads. The DPU contains a unique Data Movement System (DMS), which provides hardware acceleration for data movement and partitioning operations at the memory controller that is sufficient to keep up with DDR bandwidth. The DPU also provides acceleration for core to core communication via a unique hardware RPC mechanism called the Atomic Transaction Engine. Comparison of a DPU chip fabricated in 40nm with a Xeon processor on a variety of data processing applications shows a 3× - 15× performance per watt advantage. Sandeep R. Agrawal, Sam Idicula, Arun Raghavan, Evangelos Vlachos, Venkatraman Govindaraju, Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Cagri Balkesen, Georgios Giannikis, Charlie Roth, Nipun Agarwal, Eric Sedlar |
MICRO | 6 |
| 2015 | A Placement Vulnerability Study in Multi-Tenant Public Clouds
Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Yinqian Zhang, Thomas Ristenpart, Michael M. Swift |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2014 | Aerie: flexible file-system interfaces to storage-class memoryabstractStorage-class memory technologies such as phase-change memory and memristors present a radically different interface to storage than existing block devices. As a result, they provide a unique opportunity to re-examine storage architectures. We find that the existing kernel-based stack of components, well suited for disks, unnecessarily limits the design and implementation of file systems for this new technology. Haris Volos 0001, Sanketh Nalli, Sankaralingam Panneerselvam, Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Prashant Saxena, Michael M. Swift |
EuroSys | 4 |
| 2014 | Scheduler-based Defenses against Cross-VM Side-channels
Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Thomas Ristenpart, Michael M. Swift |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2012 | Resource-freeing attacks: improve your cloud performance (at your neighbor's expense)abstractCloud computing promises great efficiencies by multiplexing resources among disparate customers. For example, Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), Microsoft Azure, Google's Compute Engine, and Rack-space Hosting all offer Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) solutions that pack multiple customer virtual machines (VMs) onto the same physical server. Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Thawan Kooburat, Benjamin Farley, Thomas Ristenpart, Michael M. Swift |
CCS | 1 |
| 2012 | More for your money: exploiting performance heterogeneity in public cloudsabstractInfrastructure-as-a-system compute clouds such as Amazon's EC2 allow users to pay a flat hourly rate to run their virtual machine (VM) on a server providing some combination of CPU access, storage, and network. But not all VM instances are created equal: distinct underlying hardware differences, contention, and other phenomena can result in vastly differing performance across supposedly equivalent instances. The result is striking variability in the resources received for the same price. Benjamin Farley, Ari Juels, Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Thomas Ristenpart, Kevin D. Bowers, Michael M. Swift |
SoCC | 3 |
| 2010 | Game Theoretic Resistance to Denial of Service Attacks Using Hidden Difficulty Puzzles
Harikrishna Narasimhan, Venkatanathan Varadarajan, C. Pandu Rangan |
ISPEC | 2 |