Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vladimir Sadov
dblp:17/824
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 91% Robot navigation and mapping · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot coordination
multi-robot patrolling |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Adversarial Uncertainty in Multi-Robot Patrol · IJCAI 2009 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
formation control |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Using Sensor Morphology for Multirobot Formations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2008 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Using Sensor Morphology for Multirobot Formations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2008 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
sensor-based navigation |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Using Sensor Morphology for Multirobot Formations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adversarial reasoning · 0.1separation-bearing control · 0.1monitoring multigraph · 0.1graph-theoretic optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Adversarial Uncertainty in Multi-Robot Patrol
Noa Agmon, Sarit Kraus, Gal A. Kaminka, Vladimir Sadov |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2008 | Using Sensor Morphology for Multirobot FormationsabstractIn formation-maintenance (formation control) tasks, robots maintain their relative position with respect to their peers, according to a desired geometric shape. Previous work has examined formation-maintenance algorithms, based on formation control graphs, that ensure the theoretical stability of the formation. However, an exponential number of stable controllers exists. Thus a key question is how to select (construct) a formation controller that optimizes desired properties, such as sensor usage. We present a novel representation of the sensing capabilities of robots in formations, using a monitoring multigraph. We first show that graph-theoretic techniques can then be used to efficiently compute optimal sensing policies that maintain a given formation, while minimizing sensing costs. In particular, separation-bearing (distance-angle) control targets are automatically constructed for each individual robot in the formation, taking into account its specific sensor morphology. Then, we present a protocol allowing control graphs to be switched on line, to allow robots to adjust to sensory failures. We report on results from comprehensive experiments with physical and simulated robots. The results show that the use of the dynamic protocol allows formations of real robots to move significantly faster and with greater precision, while reducing the number of formation failures, due to sensor limitations. We also evaluate the sensitivity of our approach to communication reliability, and discuss opportunities and challenges raised by our approach. Gal A. Kaminka, Ruti Schechter-Glick, Vladimir Sadov |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |