Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew G. Lamperski
dblp:17/834 · also Andy Lamperski
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-0383-1830ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 35% Optimization for machine learning · 35% Learning theory · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Approximation and online algorithms · 54% Mathematical optimization · 46% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Constrained Langevin Algorithms with L-mixing External Random Variables · NeurIPS 2022 Projected Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithms for Constrained Sampling and Non-Convex Learning · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Constrained Langevin Algorithms with L-mixing External Random Variables · NeurIPS 2022 Projected Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithms for Constrained Sampling and Non-Convex Learning · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Constrained Langevin Algorithms with L-mixing External Random Variables · NeurIPS 2022 Projected Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithms for Constrained Sampling and Non-Convex Learning · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Langevin Algorithms with L-mixing External Random Variables · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
constrained sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Projected Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithms for Constrained Sampling and Non-Convex Learning · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
dynamic regret |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trading-Off Static and Dynamic Regret in Online Least-Squares and Beyond · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
online convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trading-Off Static and Dynamic Regret in Online Least-Squares and Beyond · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trading-Off Static and Dynamic Regret in Online Least-Squares and Beyond · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
recursive least squares |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trading-Off Static and Dynamic Regret in Online Least-Squares and Beyond · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Adaptive Principal Component Analysis and Its extensions · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
streaming PCA |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Adaptive Principal Component Analysis and Its extensions · ICML 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
adaptive regret |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Adaptive Principal Component Analysis and Its extensions · ICML 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Adaptive Principal Component Analysis and Its extensions · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online convex optimization for cumulative constraints · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online convex optimization for cumulative constraints · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Langevin Algorithms with L-mixing External Random Variables · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › probability metric
wasserstein distance bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Langevin Algorithms with L-mixing External Random Variables · NeurIPS 2022 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › reactive navigation
wall following |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Templates and Anchors for Antenna-Based Wall Following in Cockroaches and Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2008 Dynamical Wall Following for a Wheeled Robot Using a Passive Tactile Sensor · ICRA 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Online convex optimization for cumulative constraints · NeurIPS 2018 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bio-inspired robot
bio-inspired robot control |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Templates and Anchors for Antenna-Based Wall Following in Cockroaches and Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2008 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing
tactile feedback control |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Dynamical Wall Following for a Wheeled Robot Using a Passive Tactile Sensor · ICRA 2005 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Dynamical Wall Following for a Wheeled Robot Using a Passive Tactile Sensor · ICRA 2005 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › feedback control
PD control |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Templates and Anchors for Antenna-Based Wall Following in Cockroaches and Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online convex optimization · 1.4adaptive regret minimization · 0.8projected gradient descent · 0.6langevin algorithm · 0.6l-mixing analysis · 0.6wasserstein distance · 0.5stochastic gradient langevin dynamics · 0.5online newton method · 0.4gradient descent step size · 0.4forgetting factor · 0.4extragradient · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Constrained Langevin Algorithms with L-mixing External Random VariablesabstractLangevin algorithms are gradient descent methods augmented with additive noise, and are widely used in Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, optimization, and machine learning. In recent years, the non-asymptotic analysis of Langevin algorithms for non-convex learning has been extensively explored. For constrained problems with non-convex losses over a compact convex domain with IID data variables, the projected Langevin algorithm achieves a deviation of $O(T^{-1/4} (\log T)^{1/2})$ from its target distribution \cite{lamperski2021projected} in $1$-Wasserstein distance. In this paper, we obtain a deviation of $O(T^{-1/2} \log T)$ in $1$-Wasserstein distance for non-convex losses with $L$-mixing data variables and polyhedral constraints (which are not necessarily bounded). This improves on the previous bound for constrained problems and matches the best-known bound for unconstrained problems. Yuping Zheng, Andrew G. Lamperski |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Projected Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithms for Constrained Sampling and Non-Convex LearningabstractLangevin algorithms are gradient descent methods with additive noise. They have been used for decades in Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, optimization, and learning. Their convergence properties for unconstrained non-convex optimization and learning problems have been studied widely in the last few years. Other work has examined projected Langevin algorithms for sampling from log-concave distributions restricted to convex compact sets. For learning and optimization, log-concave distributions correspond to convex losses. In this paper, we analyze the case of non-convex losses with compact convex constraint sets and IID external data variables. We term the resulting method the projected stochastic gradient Langevin algorithm (PSGLA). We show the algorithm achieves a deviation of $O(T^{-1/4} (log T )^{1/2} )$ from its target distribution in 1-Wasserstein distance. For optimization and learning, we show that the algorithm achieves $\epsilon$-suboptimal solutions, on average, provided that it is run for a time that is polynomial in $\epsilon$ and slightly super-exponential in the problem dimension. Andrew G. Lamperski |
COLT | 1 |
| 2020 | Trading-Off Static and Dynamic Regret in Online Least-Squares and BeyondabstractRecursive least-squares algorithms often use forgetting factors as a heuristic to adapt to non-stationary data streams. The first contribution of this paper rigorously characterizes the effect of forgetting factors for a class of online Newton algorithms. For exp-concave and strongly convex objectives, the algorithms achieve the dynamic regret of max{O(log T),O(√TV)}, where V is a bound on the path length of the comparison sequence. In particular, we show how classic recursive least-squares with a forgetting factor achieves this dynamic regret bound. By varying V, we obtain a trade-off between static and dynamic regret. In order to obtain more computationally efficient algorithms, our second contribution is a novel gradient descent step size rule for strongly convex functions. Our gradient descent rule recovers the order optimal dynamic regret bounds described above. For smooth problems, we can also obtain static regret of O(T1-β) and dynamic regret of O(Tβ V*), where β ∈ (0,1) and V* is the path length of the sequence of minimizers. By varying β, we obtain a trade-off between static and dynamic regret. Jianjun Yuan 0004, Andrew G. Lamperski |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Online Adaptive Principal Component Analysis and Its extensionsabstractWe propose algorithms for online principal component analysis (PCA) and variance minimization for adaptive settings. Previous literature has focused on upper bounding the static adversarial regret, whose comparator is the optimal fixed action in hindsight. However, static regret is not an appropriate metric when the underlying environment is changing. Instead, we adopt the adaptive regret metric from the previous literature and propose online adaptive algorithms for PCA and variance minimization, that have sub-linear adaptive regret guarantees. We demonstrate both theoretically and experimentally that the proposed algorithms can adapt to the changing environments. Jianjun Yuan 0004, Andrew G. Lamperski |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Online convex optimization for cumulative constraintsabstractWe propose the algorithms for online convex optimization which lead to cumulative squared constraint violations of the form $\sum\limits_{t=1}^T\big([g(x_t)]_+\big)^2=O(T^{1-\beta})$, where $\beta\in(0,1)$. Previous literature has focused on long-term constraints of the form $\sum\limits_{t=1}^Tg(x_t)$. There, strictly feasible solutions can cancel out the effects of violated constraints. In contrast, the new form heavily penalizes large constraint violations and cancellation effects cannot occur. Furthermore, useful bounds on the single step constraint violation $[g(x_t)]_+$ are derived. For convex objectives, our regret bounds generalize existing bounds, and for strongly convex objectives we give improved regret bounds. In numerical experiments, we show that our algorithm closely follows the constraint boundary leading to low cumulative violation. Jianjun Yuan 0004, Andrew G. Lamperski |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Seizure Control in a Computational Model Using a Reinforcement Learning Stimulation ParadigmabstractNeuromodulation technologies such as vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation, have shown some efficacy in controlling seizures in medically intractable patients. However, inherent patient-to-patient variability of seizure disorders leads to a wide range of therapeutic efficacy. A patient specific approach to determining stimulation parameters may lead to increased therapeutic efficacy while minimizing stimulation energy and side effects. This paper presents a reinforcement learning algorithm that optimizes stimulation frequency for controlling seizures with minimum stimulation energy. We apply our method to a computational model called the epileptor. The epileptor model simulates inter-ictal and ictal local field potential data. In order to apply reinforcement learning to the Epileptor, we introduce a specialized reward function and state-space discretization. With the reward function and discretization fixed, we test the effectiveness of the temporal difference reinforcement learning algorithm (TD(0)). For periodic pulsatile stimulation, we derive a relation that describes, for any stimulation frequency, the minimal pulse amplitude required to suppress seizures. The TD(0) algorithm is able to identify parameters that control seizures quickly. Additionally, our results show that the TD(0) algorithm refines the stimulation frequency to minimize stimulation energy thereby converging to optimal parameters reliably. An advantage of the TD(0) algorithm is that it is adaptive so that the parameters necessary to control the seizures can change over time. We show that the algorithm can converge on the optimal solution in simulation with slow and fast inter-seizure intervals. Vivek Nagaraj, Andrew G. Lamperski, Theoden I. Netoff |
Int. J. Neural Syst. | 2 |
| 2012 | Verification of Periodically Controlled Hybrid Systems: Application to an Autonomous VehicleabstractThis article introduces Periodically Controlled Hybrid Automata (PCHA) for modular specification of embedded control systems. In a PCHA, control actions that change the control input to the plant occur roughly periodically, while other actions that update the state of the controller may occur in the interim. Such actions could model, for example, sensor updates and information received from higher-level planning modules that change the set point of the controller. Based on periodicity and subtangential conditions, a new sufficient condition for verifying invariant properties of PCHAs is presented. For PCHAs with polynomial continuous vector fields, it is possible to check these conditions automatically using, for example, quantifier elimination or sum of squares decomposition. We examine the feasibility of this automatic approach on a small example. The proposed technique is also used to manually verify safety and progress properties of a fairly complex planner-controller subsystem of an autonomous ground vehicle. Geometric properties of planner-generated paths are derived which guarantee that such paths can be safely followed by the controller. Tichakorn Wongpiromsarn, Sayan Mitra 0001, Andrew G. Lamperski, Richard M. Murray |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 3 |
| 2009 | Periodically Controlled Hybrid Systems
Tichakorn Wongpiromsarn, Sayan Mitra 0001, Richard M. Murray, Andrew G. Lamperski |
HSCC | 4 |
| 2008 | Templates and Anchors for Antenna-Based Wall Following in Cockroaches and RobotsabstractThe interplay between robotics and neuromechanics facilitates discoveries in both fields: nature provides roboticists with design ideas, while robotics research elucidates critical features that confer performance advantages to biological systems. Here, we explore a system particularly well suited to exploit the synergies between biology and robotics: high-speed antenna-based wall following of the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana). Our approach integrates mathematical and hardware modeling with behavioral and neurophysiological experiments. Specifically, we corroborate a prediction from a previously reported wall-following template - the simplest model that captures a behavior - that a cockroach antenna-based controller requires the rate of approach to a wall in addition to distance, e.g., in the form of a proportional-derivative (PD) controller. Neurophysiological experiments reveal that important features of the wall-following controller emerge at the earliest stages of sensory processing, namely in the antennal nerve. Furthermore, we embed the template in a robotic platform outfitted with a bio-inspired antenna. Using this system, we successfully test specific PD gains (up to a scale) fitted to the cockroach behavioral data in a "real-world" setting, lending further credence to the surprisingly simple notion that a cockroach might implement a PD controller for wall following. Finally, we embed the template in a simulated lateral-leg-spring (LLS) model using the center of pressure as the control input. Importantly, the same PD gains fitted to cockroach behavior also stabilize wall following for the LLS model. Jusuk Lee, S. N. Sponberg, Owen Y. Loh, Andrew G. Lamperski, Robert J. Full, Noah J. Cowan |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 4 |
| 2005 | Dynamical Wall Following for a Wheeled Robot Using a Passive Tactile SensorabstractFeedback from antennae - long, flexible tactile sensors - enables cockroaches and other arthropods to rapidly maneuver through poorly lit and cluttered environments. Inspired by their performance, we created a wall-following controller for a dynamic wheeled robot using tactile antenna feedback. We show this controller is stable for a wide range of control gains and robot system parameters. To test the controller, we constructed a two-link antenna that uses potentiometers and capacitive contact sensors. Experiments based on the prototype demonstrate that our controller robustly tracks unexpected corners ranging from -60° to +900. Andrew G. Lamperski, Owen Y. Loh, Brett L. Kutscher, Noah J. Cowan |
ICRA | 1 |