Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ila Miller

dblp:17/949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 77% Performance modeling and evaluation · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
join processing
0.011987
Tree Structured Multiple Processor Join Methods · ICDE 1987
Query processing and optimization › join processing
parallel join
0.011987
Tree Structured Multiple Processor Join Methods · ICDE 1987
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel query processing
0.011987
Tree Structured Multiple Processor Join Methods · ICDE 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hashing · 0.0cost analysis · 0.0semijoin · 0.0semi-join · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 Tree Structured Multiple Processor Join Methods
abstract
This paper summarizes the execution cost of join operations performed by parallel executing processors. Four different parallel join algorithms are proposed for execution on multiple processing nodes interconnected on a tree structured communication network. Secondary storage is accessed in parallel by leaf nodes. An average execution cost analysis is presented for the multiple processor join methods. For a reasonable ratio of result to operand cardinality, joins which use hashing for semi-join of operands at the leaf node secondary storage interface are predicted to perform better than nested-loop and sort-merge joins. Both node memory capacity and join result cardinality have a large influence on the relative performance of the join methods. This analysis method forms a basis for selecting among alternative processing methods for statically linked, multiple processor computer architectures.
Roger K. Shultz, Ila Miller
ICDE2