Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daekyoung Jung
dblp:17/9598
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
User interface design and tools · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization literacy › visualization interpretation
chart image analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | ChartSense: Interactive Data Extraction from Chart Images · CHI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.6interactive extraction algorithms · 0.6deep learning based classifier · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | ChartSense: Interactive Data Extraction from Chart ImagesabstractCharts are commonly used to present data in digital documents such as web pages, research papers, or presentation slides. When the underlying data is not available, it is necessary to extract the data from a chart image to utilize the data for further analysis or improve the chart for more accurate perception. In this paper, we present ChartSense, an interactive chart data extraction system. ChartSense first determines the chart type of a given chart image using a deep learning based classifier, and then extracts underlying data from the chart image using semi-automatic, interactive extraction algorithms optimized for each chart type. To evaluate chart type classification accuracy, we compared ChartSense with ReVision, a system with the state-of-the-art chart type classifier. We found that ChartSense was more accurate than ReVision. In addition, to evaluate data extraction performance, we conducted a user study, comparing ChartSense with WebPlotDigitizer, one of the most effective chart data extraction tools among publicly accessible ones. Our results showed that ChartSense was better than WebPlotDigitizer in terms of task completion time, error rate, and subjective preference. Daekyoung Jung, Wonjae Kim, Hyunjoo Song, Jeongin Hwang, Bongshin Lee, Bo Hyoung Kim, Jinwook Seo |
CHI | 1 |