Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roberto Rigamonti

dblp:17/9989 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 72% Image recognition and object detection · 28%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › feature extraction
curvilinear structure extraction
0.212015
Learning Separable Filters · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112011
Are sparse representations really relevant for image classification? · CVPR 2011
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.112011
Are sparse representations really relevant for image classification? · CVPR 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

overcomplete dictionary · 0.4separable filter decomposition · 0.3linear combination · 0.2over-complete dictionary · 0.2unsupervised learning · 0.1sparse coding · 0.1filter bank · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Transparent FPGA flow
abstract
In this demo we propose an automated flow that allows the transparent execution of ordinary code on a heterogeneous platform including an FPGA. Our solution requires no change in the code, not even pragma indications to guide the optimization, and dynamically adapts its behaviour to the available data and the workload of the system. Thus, the developer does not need to be aware of the target platform details, nor she has to forecast usage patterns to prevent performance bottlenecks, as the system transparently identifies parallelizable, computationally-intensive code fragments and dispatches them to a data flow overlay architecture built on top of the FPGA. Since the bitstream we use is fixed, and contrary to HLS, we can alter the functionalities offered by the FPGA on-the-fly to adapt them to current usage. Finally, since we operate at the LLVM's Intermediate Representation (IR) level, our approach is language-agnostic.
Baptiste Delporte, Anthony Convers, Roberto Rigamonti, Alberto Dassatti
FPL3
2015 Learning Separable Filters
abstract
Learning filters to produce sparse image representations in terms of over-complete dictionaries has emerged as a powerful way to create image features for many different purposes. Unfortunately, these filters are usually both numerous and non-separable, making their use computationally expensive. In this paper, we show that such filters can be computed as linear combinations of a smaller number of separable ones, thus greatly reducing the computational complexity at no cost in terms of performance. This makes filter learning approaches practical even for large images or 3D volumes, and we show that we significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods on the curvilinear structure extraction task, in terms of both accuracy and speed. Moreover, our approach is general and can be used on generic convolutional filter banks to reduce the complexity of the feature extraction step.
Amos Sironi, Bugra Tekin, Roberto Rigamonti, Vincent Lepetit, Pascal Fua
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2014 On the relevance of sparsity for image classification
Roberto Rigamonti, Vincent Lepetit, Germán González, Engin Türetken, Fethallah Benmansour, Matthew A. Brown, Pascal Fua
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.1
2013 Learning Separable Filters
abstract
Learning filters to produce sparse image representations in terms of over complete dictionaries has emerged as a powerful way to create image features for many different purposes. Unfortunately, these filters are usually both numerous and non-separable, making their use computationally expensive. In this paper, we show that such filters can be computed as linear combinations of a smaller number of separable ones, thus greatly reducing the computational complexity at no cost in terms of performance. This makes filter learning approaches practical even for large images or 3D volumes, and we show that we significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods on the linear structure extraction task, in terms of both accuracy and speed. Moreover, our approach is general and can be used on generic filter banks to reduce the complexity of the convolutions.
Roberto Rigamonti, Amos Sironi, Vincent Lepetit, Pascal Fua
CVPR1
2013 Supervised Feature Learning for Curvilinear Structure Segmentation
Carlos J. Becker, Roberto Rigamonti, Vincent Lepetit, Pascal Fua
MICCAI (1)2
2012 Accurate and Efficient Linear Structure Segmentation by Leveraging Ad Hoc Features with Learned Filters
Roberto Rigamonti, Vincent Lepetit
MICCAI (1)1
2011 Are sparse representations really relevant for image classification?
abstract
Recent years have seen an increasing interest in sparse representations for image classification and object recognition, probably motivated by evidence from the analysis of the primate visual cortex. It is still unclear, however, whether or not sparsity helps classification. In this paper we evaluate its impact on the recognition rate using a shallow modular architecture, adopting both standard filter banks and filter banks learned in an unsupervised way. In our experiments on the CIFAR-10 and on the Caltech-101 datasets, enforcing sparsity constraints actually does not improve recognition performance. This has an important practical impact in image descriptor design, as enforcing these constraints can have a heavy computational cost.
Roberto Rigamonti, Matthew A. Brown, Vincent Lepetit
CVPR1