EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonghyuk Park 0004
dblp:170/1448-4 · also Jong Hyuk (Jay) Park, Jong Hyuk Park 0004
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2701-3501ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% Vision and language · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
ontology learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Visually Grounded Domain Ontologies via Embodied Conversation and Explanation · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › grounded language learning
visually grounded language learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Visually Grounded Domain Ontologies via Embodied Conversation and Explanation · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bootstrapping Distantly Supervised IE Using Joint Learning and Small Well-Structured Corpora · AAAI 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bootstrapping Distantly Supervised IE Using Joint Learning and Small Well-Structured Corpora · AAAI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
explanation-based learning · 0.9embodied conversation · 0.9corrective feedback · 0.9label propagation · 0.3joint learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning Visually Grounded Domain Ontologies via Embodied Conversation and ExplanationabstractIn this paper, we offer a learning framework in which the agent's knowledge gaps are overcome through corrective feedback from a teacher whenever the agent explains its (incorrect) predictions. We test it in a low-resource visual processing scenario, in which the agent must learn to recognize distinct types of toy truck. The agent starts the learning process with no ontology about what types of truck exist nor which parts they have, and a deficient model for recognizing those parts from visual input. The teacher's feedback to the agent's explanations addresses its lack of relevant knowledge in the ontology via a generic rule (e.g., "dump trucks have dumpers"), whereas an inaccurate part recognition is corrected by a deictic statement (e.g., "this is not a dumper"). The learner utilizes this feedback not only to improve its estimate of the hypothesis space of possible domain ontologies and probability distributions over them but also to use those estimates to update its visual interpretation of the scene. Our experiments demonstrate that teacher-learner pairs utilizing explanations and corrections are more data-efficient than those without such a faculty. Jonghyuk Park 0004, Alex Lascarides, Subramanian Ramamoorthy |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Bootstrapping Distantly Supervised IE Using Joint Learning and Small Well-Structured CorporaabstractWe propose a framework to improve the performance of distantly-supervised relation extraction, by jointly learning to solve two related tasks: concept-instance extraction and relation extraction. We further extend this framework to make a novel use of document structure: in some small, well-structured corpora, sections can be identified that correspond to relation arguments, and distantly-labeled examples from such sections tend to have good precision. Using these as seeds we extract additional relation examples by applying label propagation on a graph composed of noisy examples extracted from a large unstructured testing corpus. Combined with the soft constraint that concept examples should have the same type as the second argument of the relation, we get significant improvements over several state-of-the-art approaches to distantly-supervised relation extraction, and reasonable extraction performance even with very small set of distant labels. Lidong Bing, Bhuwan Dhingra, Kathryn Mazaitis, Jonghyuk Park 0004, William W. Cohen |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2016 | Active Learning Algorithms for Graphical Model SelectionabstractThe problem of learning the structure of a high dimensional graphical model from data has received considerable attention in recent years. In many applications such as sensor networks and proteomics it is often expensive to obtain samples from all the variables involved simultaneously. For instance, this might involve the synchronization of a large number of sensors or the tagging of a large number of proteins. To address this important issue, we initiate the study of a novel graphical model selection problem, where the goal is to optimize the total number of scalar samples obtained by allowing the collection of samples from only subsets of the variables. We propose a general paradigm for graphical model selection where feedback is used to guide the sampling to high degree vertices, while obtaining only few samples from the ones with the low degrees. We instantiate this framework with two specific active learning algorithms, one of which makes mild assumptions but is computationally expensive, while the other is computationally more efficient but requires stronger (nevertheless standard) assumptions. Whereas the sample complexity of passive algorithms is typically a function of the maximum degree of the graph, we show that the sample complexity of our algorithms is provably smaller and that it depends on a novel local complexity measure that is akin to the average degree of the graph. We finally demonstrate the efficacy of our framework via simulations. Gautam Dasarathy, Aarti Singh, Maria-Florina Balcan, Jonghyuk Park 0004 |
AISTATS | 4 |