Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Constance May Bainbridge

dblp:170/1615 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 50% Virtual and augmented reality · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality
eye tracking
0.212016
Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016
Visualization and visual analytics
memorability
0.212016
Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016
User interface design and tools
design guidelines
0.112016
Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text description analysis · 0.5eye movement analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall
abstract
In this paper we move beyond memorability and investigate how visualizations are recognized and recalled. For this study we labeled a dataset of 393 visualizations and analyzed the eye movements of 33 participants as well as thousands of participant-generated text descriptions of the visualizations. This allowed us to determine what components of a visualization attract people's attention, and what information is encoded into memory. Our findings quantitatively support many conventional qualitative design guidelines, including that (1) titles and supporting text should convey the message of a visualization, (2) if used appropriately, pictograms do not interfere with understanding and can improve recognition, and (3) redundancy helps effectively communicate the message. Importantly, we show that visualizations memorable "at-a-glance" are also capable of effectively conveying the message of the visualization. Thus, a memorable visualization is often also an effective one.
Michelle Borkin, Zoya Bylinskii, Constance May Bainbridge, Chelsea S. Yeh, Daniel Borkin, Hanspeter Pfister, Aude Oliva
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.4