Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hari Mukka

dblp:170/2126 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 92% High-performance computing · 8%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation
algorithm synthesis
0.212016
Real-time synthesis of compression algorithms for scientific data · SC 2016
Storage systems
data compression
0.212016
Real-time synthesis of compression algorithms for scientific data · SC 2016
Storage systems › data compression
floating-point compression
0.212016
Real-time synthesis of compression algorithms for scientific data · SC 2016
Storage systems › data compression
lossless compression
0.212016
Real-time synthesis of compression algorithms for scientific data · SC 2016
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.112016
Real-time synthesis of compression algorithms for scientific data · SC 2016
Storage systems › data management
scientific data storage
0.112016
Real-time synthesis of compression algorithms for scientific data · SC 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program synthesis · 0.5OpenMP parallelization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Real-time synthesis of compression algorithms for scientific data
abstract
Many scientific programs produce large amounts of floating-point data that are saved for later use. To minimize the storage requirement, it is worthwhile to compress such data as much as possible. However, existing algorithms tend to com-press floating-point data relatively poorly. As a remedy, we have developed FPcrush, a tool that automatically synthesizes an optimized compressor for each given input. The synthesized algorithms are lossless and parallelized using OpenMP. This paper describes how FPcrush is able to perform this synthesis in real-time, i.e., even when accounting for the synthesis overhead, it compresses the 16 tested real-world single- and double-precision data files more quickly than parallel bzip2. Decompression is an order of magnitude faster and exceeds the throughput of multi-core implementations of bzip2, gzip, and FPC. On all but two of the tested files, as well as on average, the customized algorithms deliver higher compression ratios than the other three tools.
Martin Burtscher, Hari Mukka, Annie Yang, Farbod Hesaaraki
SC2
2015 MPC: A Massively Parallel Compression Algorithm for Scientific Data
abstract
Due to their high peak performance and energy efficiency, massively parallel accelerators such as GPUs are quickly spreading in high-performance computing, where large amounts of floating-point data are processed, transferred, and stored. Such environments can greatly benefit from data compression if done sufficiently quickly. Unfortunately, most conventional compression algorithms are unsuitable for highly parallel execution. In fact, it is generally unknown how to design good compression algorithms for massively parallel systems. To remedy this situation, we study 138,240 lossless compression algorithms for single-and double-precision floating-point values that are built exclusively from easily parallelizable components. We analyze the best of these algorithms, explain why they compress well, and derive the Massively Parallel Compression (MPC) algorithm from them. This novel algorithm requires almost no internal state, achieves heretofore unreached compression ratios on several data sets, and roughly matches the best CPU-based algorithms in compression ratio while outperforming them by one to two orders of magnitude in throughput.
Annie Yang, Hari Mukka, Farbod Hesaaraki, Martin Burtscher
CLUSTER2