Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Connor Bolton

dblp:170/2513 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-4079-7846ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 49% Systems and software security · 37% Hardware security and side channels · 15%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 51% Embedded and real-time systems · 34% Storage systems · 15%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security
sensor security
0.412020
SoK: A Minimalist Approach to Formalizing Analog Sensor Security · SP 2020
Hardware security and side channels
fault attacks
0.112020
SoK: A Minimalist Approach to Formalizing Analog Sensor Security · SP 2020
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.112018
Blue Note: How Intentional Acoustic Interference Damages Availability and Integrity in Hard Disk Drives and Operating Systems · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.112015
Poster: Towards Robust Reprogramming for Wireless Sensors · SenSys 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensor fusion · 0.7feedback control · 0.7hardware-based separation of programmer and target · 0.4transfer function modeling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Characterizing and Mitigating Touchtone Eavesdropping in Smartphone Motion Sensors
abstract
Smartphone motion sensors provide cybersecurity attackers with a stealthy way to eavesdrop on nearby acoustic information. Eavesdropping on touchtones emitted by smartphone speakers when users input numbers into their phones exposes sensitive information such as credit card information, banking PINs, and social security card numbers to malicious applications with access to only motion sensor data. This work characterizes this new security threat of touchtone eavesdropping by providing an analysis based on physics and signal processing theory. We show that advanced adversaries who selectively integrate data from multiple motion sensors and multiple sensor axes can achieve over 99% accuracy on recognizing 12 unique touchtones. We further design, analyze, and evaluate several mitigations which could be implemented in a smartphone update. We found that some apparent mitigations such as low-pass filters can undesirably reduce the motion sensor data to benign applications by 83% but only reduce an advanced adversary’s accuracy by less than one percent. Other more informed designs such as anti-aliasing filters can fully preserve the motion sensor data to support benign application functionality while reducing attack accuracy by 50.1%.
Connor Bolton, Yan Long 0002, Jun Han 0001, Josiah D. Hester, Kevin Fu
RAID1
2020 SoK: A Minimalist Approach to Formalizing Analog Sensor Security
abstract
Over the last six years, several papers demonstrated how intentional analog interference based on acoustics, RF, lasers, and other physical modalities could induce faults, influence, or even control the output of sensors. Damage to the availability and integrity of sensor output carries significant risks to safety-critical systems that make automated decisions based on trusted sensor measurement. Established signal processing models use transfer functions to express reliability and dependability characteristics of sensors, but existing models do not provide a deliberate way to express and capture security properties meaningfully.Our work begins to fill this gap by systematizing knowledge of analog attacks against sensor circuitry and defenses. Our primary contribution is a simple sensor security model such that sensor engineers can better express analog security properties of sensor circuitry without needing to learn significantly new notation. Our model introduces transfer functions and a vector of adversarial noise to represent adversarial capabilities at each stage of a sensor's signal conditioning chain. The primary goals of the systematization are (1) to enable more meaningful quantification of risk for the design and evaluation of past and future sensors, (2) to better predict new attack vectors, and (3) to establish defensive design patterns that make sensors more resistant to analog attacks.
Chen Yan 0001, Hocheol Shin, Connor Bolton, Wenyuan Xu 0001, Yongdae Kim, Kevin Fu
SP3
2018 Blue Note: How Intentional Acoustic Interference Damages Availability and Integrity in Hard Disk Drives and Operating Systems
abstract
Intentional acoustic interference causes unusual errors in the mechanics of magnetic hard disk drives in desktop and laptop computers, leading to damage to integrity and availability in both hardware and software such as file system corruption and operating system reboots. An adversary without any special purpose equipment can co-opt built-in speakers or nearby emitters to cause persistent errors. Our work traces the deeper causality of these risks from the physics of materials to the I/O request stack in operating systems for audible and ultrasonic sound. Our experiments show that audible sound causes the head stack assembly to vibrate outside of operational bounds; ultrasonic sound causes false positives in the shock sensor, which is designed to prevent a head crash. The problem poses a challenge for legacy magnetic disks that remain stubbornly common in safety critical applications such as medical devices and other highly utilized systems difficult to sunset. Thus, we created and modeled a new feedback controller that could be deployed as a firmware update to attenuate the intentional acoustic interference. Our sensor fusion method prevents unnecessary head parking by detecting ultrasonic triggering of the shock sensor.
Connor Bolton, Sara Rampazzi, Chaohao Li, Andrew Kwong, Wenyuan Xu 0001, Kevin Fu
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy1
2015 Poster: Towards Robust Reprogramming for Wireless Sensors
abstract
Embedded systems that are wirelessly reprogrammed can be rendered useless by certain programming errors, excessive power consumption, or misconfigurations in the hardware. These types of situations can leave a device in a state that compromises its programmability, often rendering the device useless. Existing attempts to address the problem of robust wireless reprogramming have all been software-based solutions, that are vulnerable to certain errors, such as memory corruption, can corrupt the recovery programs. We propose a hardware-based solution to wireless reprogramming, physically separating the programmer and target device. This separation limits the propagation of errors, and ensures the device will always be recoverable. In this poster we will present the design and an early prototype of our approach -- an ultra-low-power, low-cost hardware solution to ensure recovery from fatal errors and reprogrammability in wireless systems. This poster discusses the current system design, initial results, and system analysis from our current prototype. We also present future and ongoing directions, as well as key research questions. This work was funded by National Science Foundation grants CNS-1314342 and CNS-1453607. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Nicole Tobias, Connor Bolton, Josiah D. Hester, Lanny Sitanayah, Jacob Sorber
SenSys2