EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bagus Wibowo
dblp:170/3239
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 72% Performance modeling and evaluation · 28% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
architectural vulnerability factor |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
cross-layer resilience |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
online estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reliability analysis
vulnerability estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear regression · 0.2cross-layer metadata · 0.2PVF-HVF · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability EstimationabstractProcessor soft-error rates are projected to increase as feature sizes scale down, necessitating the adoption of reliability-enhancing techniques, but power and performance overhead remain a concern of such techniques. Dynamic cross-layer techniques are a promising way to improve the cost-effectiveness of resilient systems. As a foundation for making such a system, we propose a cross-layer approach for estimating the architectural vulnerability of a processor core online that works by combining information from software, compiler, and microarchitectural layers at runtime. The hardware layer combines the metadata from software and compiler layers with microarchitectural measurements to estimate architectural vulnerability online. We describe our design and evaluate it in detail on a set of SPEC CPU 2006 applications. We find that our online AVF estimate is highly accurate with respect to a postmortem AVF analysis, with only 0.46% average absolute error. Also, our design incurs negligible performance impact for SPEC2006 applications and about 1.2% for a Monte Carlo application, requires approximately 1.4% area overhead, and costs about 3.3% more power on average. We compare our technique against two prior online AVF estimation techniques, one using a linear regression to estimate AVF and another based on PVF-HVF; our evaluation finds that our approach, on average, is more accurate. Our case study of a Monte Carlo simulation shows that our AVF estimate can adapt to the inherent resiliency of the algorithm. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using a dynamic protection scheme that limits vulnerability to soft errors while reducing the energy consumption by an average of 4.8%, and with a target normalized SER of 10%, compared to enabling a simple parity+ECC protection at all times. Bagus Wibowo, Abhinav Agrawal 0003, Thomas Stanton, James Tuck 0001 |
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. | 1 |