Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Bagus Wibowo

dblp:170/3239 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 72% Performance modeling and evaluation · 28%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
architectural vulnerability factor
0.212016
An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
cross-layer resilience
0.212016
An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016
Performance modeling and evaluation
online estimation
0.212016
An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.212016
An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.112016
An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reliability analysis
vulnerability estimation
0.112016
An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear regression · 0.2cross-layer metadata · 0.2PVF-HVF · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation
abstract
Processor soft-error rates are projected to increase as feature sizes scale down, necessitating the adoption of reliability-enhancing techniques, but power and performance overhead remain a concern of such techniques. Dynamic cross-layer techniques are a promising way to improve the cost-effectiveness of resilient systems. As a foundation for making such a system, we propose a cross-layer approach for estimating the architectural vulnerability of a processor core online that works by combining information from software, compiler, and microarchitectural layers at runtime. The hardware layer combines the metadata from software and compiler layers with microarchitectural measurements to estimate architectural vulnerability online. We describe our design and evaluate it in detail on a set of SPEC CPU 2006 applications. We find that our online AVF estimate is highly accurate with respect to a postmortem AVF analysis, with only 0.46% average absolute error. Also, our design incurs negligible performance impact for SPEC2006 applications and about 1.2% for a Monte Carlo application, requires approximately 1.4% area overhead, and costs about 3.3% more power on average. We compare our technique against two prior online AVF estimation techniques, one using a linear regression to estimate AVF and another based on PVF-HVF; our evaluation finds that our approach, on average, is more accurate. Our case study of a Monte Carlo simulation shows that our AVF estimate can adapt to the inherent resiliency of the algorithm. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using a dynamic protection scheme that limits vulnerability to soft errors while reducing the energy consumption by an average of 4.8%, and with a target normalized SER of 10%, compared to enabling a simple parity+ECC protection at all times.
Bagus Wibowo, Abhinav Agrawal 0003, Thomas Stanton, James Tuck 0001
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.1